Beard Courtney, Rifkin Lara S, Björgvinsson Thröstur
Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, United States.
Department of Psychiatry, McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Belmont, MA, United States.
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan 1;207:321-326. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.021. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
Interpretation bias, the tendency to interpret ambiguous situations negatively (or to lack a positive bias), is a cognitive vulnerability associated with psychopathology. However, there is a lack of research characterizing this bias in psychiatric samples, including whether it is also a risk factor for suicidality. This study characterized interpretation bias in a psychiatric sample at risk for suicide and examined the relationship between interpretation bias and suicidality cross-sectionally and prospectively.
Patients (N=65) attending a partial hospital program completed the Word-Sentence Association Paradigm (WSAP), which results in four variables reflecting different types of interpretation bias: endorsement rates and reaction time bias scores for negative and benign interpretations. We conducted logistic regression models to predict high suicidality (ideation, plans, attempts, etc. assessed via a structured interview at admission) and suicidal ideation (assessed via self-report at admission and discharge).
Logistic regression models predicting suicide outcomes upon admission and discharge indicated that benign interpretation endorsement was the most robust predictor of suicidality concurrently and prospectively, controlling for baseline suicidal ideation.
Lack of gold standard self-report suicide assessment. Unable to assess additional constructs such as hopelessness or perfectionism, which may better elucidate how lacking a benign bias influences suicidality. Modest sample size.
A lower endorsement of positive interpretations was the strongest predictor of prospective suicidal ideation, even after controlling for baseline suicidal ideation. Future research should examine how targeting interpretation bias influences suicidality.
解释偏差,即将模棱两可的情况消极解读的倾向(或缺乏积极偏差),是一种与精神病理学相关的认知易感性。然而,在精神科样本中缺乏对这种偏差的研究,包括它是否也是自杀倾向的危险因素。本研究对有自杀风险的精神科样本中的解释偏差进行了特征描述,并对解释偏差与自杀倾向之间的关系进行了横断面和前瞻性研究。
参加部分住院项目的患者(N = 65)完成了单词 - 句子联想范式(WSAP),该范式产生四个反映不同类型解释偏差的变量:消极和良性解释的认可率及反应时间偏差分数。我们进行了逻辑回归模型,以预测高自杀倾向(通过入院时的结构化访谈评估的自杀意念、计划、企图等)和自杀意念(通过入院和出院时的自我报告评估)。
预测入院和出院时自杀结果的逻辑回归模型表明,在控制基线自杀意念的情况下,良性解释认可在同时期和前瞻性方面是自杀倾向最有力的预测指标。
缺乏金标准的自我报告自杀评估。无法评估绝望或完美主义等其他构念,而这些构念可能能更好地阐明缺乏良性偏差如何影响自杀倾向。样本量较小。
即使在控制基线自杀意念之后,对积极解释的较低认可仍是前瞻性自杀意念的最强预测指标。未来的研究应探讨针对解释偏差如何影响自杀倾向。