Medicis team, INSERM U1099, Université de Rennes 1 LTSI, 35000 Rennes, France.
Center for Medical Image Computing. University College London, WC1E 6BT London, United Kingdom.
Med Image Anal. 2017 Jan;35:633-654. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
In recent years, tremendous progress has been made in surgical practice for example with Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS). To overcome challenges coming from deported eye-to-hand manipulation, robotic and computer-assisted systems have been developed. Having real-time knowledge of the pose of surgical tools with respect to the surgical camera and underlying anatomy is a key ingredient for such systems. In this paper, we present a review of the literature dealing with vision-based and marker-less surgical tool detection. This paper includes three primary contributions: (1) identification and analysis of data-sets used for developing and testing detection algorithms, (2) in-depth comparison of surgical tool detection methods from the feature extraction process to the model learning strategy and highlight existing shortcomings, and (3) analysis of validation techniques employed to obtain detection performance results and establish comparison between surgical tool detectors. The papers included in the review were selected through PubMed and Google Scholar searches using the keywords: "surgical tool detection", "surgical tool tracking", "surgical instrument detection" and "surgical instrument tracking" limiting results to the year range 2000 2015. Our study shows that despite significant progress over the years, the lack of established surgical tool data-sets, and reference format for performance assessment and method ranking is preventing faster improvement.
近年来,外科实践取得了巨大的进展,例如微创外科(MIS)。为了克服眼到手操作被排斥的挑战,已经开发出了机器人和计算机辅助系统。实时了解手术工具相对于手术摄像机和基础解剖结构的姿态是这些系统的关键要素。在本文中,我们对基于视觉和无标记的手术工具检测文献进行了综述。本文包括三个主要贡献:(1)确定并分析了用于开发和测试检测算法的数据集,(2)深入比较了从特征提取过程到模型学习策略的手术工具检测方法,并突出了现有缺点,(3)分析了用于获得检测性能结果并在手术工具检测器之间建立比较的验证技术。通过在 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 上使用关键字“surgical tool detection”、“surgical tool tracking”、“surgical instrument detection”和“surgical instrument tracking”进行搜索,并将结果限制在 2000 年至 2015 年的范围内,选择了综述中包含的论文。我们的研究表明,尽管近年来取得了重大进展,但缺乏既定的手术工具数据集以及性能评估和方法排名的参考格式,这阻碍了更快的改进。