Deek Matthew P, Kim Sinae, Yue Ning, Baby Rekha, Ahmed Inaya, Zou Wei, Langenfeld John, Aisner Joseph, Jabbour Salma K
Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
School of Public Health, Biometrics Division, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Sep;8(9):2602-2609. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.08.95.
To investigate the impact of advances in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) on the outcomes of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with chemoradiation therapy (CRT).
We retrospectively reviewed 91 patients with NSCLC treated with definitive CRT using image guidance with daily orthogonal kilovoltage (kV) imaging compared to standard weekly megavoltage (MV) portal verifications. Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival and locoregional failure were computed and stratified by image guidance techniques. Log-rank tests were used to compare strata. Cox Proportional Hazards models were used to identify risk factors for worse mortality and locoregional control.
Fifty-four percent (n=49) of patients received weekly MV portal imaging, while 46% (n=42) underwent IGRT using daily orthogonal kV imaging. kV IGRT was associated with longer median survival (36.4 months) compared to MV imaging (14.9 months; P=0.01). kV imaging was also marginally associated with lower risk of locoregional failure. Median time to local progression in patients imaged with kV was 21.4 months compared to 10.9 months (P=0.065) for those treated with MV portal imaging.
Daily kV imaging appears to be marginally associated with better survival and disease control when compared to MV imaging. Given the small study size and the numerable factors tested, these finding require additional confirmation.
探讨图像引导放射治疗(IGRT)技术的进步对接受放化疗(CRT)的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者治疗结局的影响。
我们回顾性分析了91例接受根治性CRT的NSCLC患者,其中一组采用每日正交千伏(kV)成像进行图像引导,另一组采用标准的每周兆伏(MV)门静脉验证。计算总生存和局部区域失败的Kaplan-Meier曲线,并按图像引导技术进行分层。采用对数秩检验比较各层。使用Cox比例风险模型确定死亡率和局部区域控制较差的危险因素。
54%(n = 49)的患者接受每周MV门静脉成像,而46%(n = 42)的患者采用每日正交kV成像进行IGRT。与MV成像(14.9个月;P = 0.01)相比,kV IGRT与更长的中位生存期(36.4个月)相关。kV成像与局部区域失败风险较低也有一定关联。kV成像患者的局部进展中位时间为21.4个月,而MV门静脉成像患者为10.9个月(P = 0.065)。
与MV成像相比,每日kV成像似乎与更好的生存和疾病控制有一定关联。鉴于研究规模较小且测试的因素众多,这些发现需要进一步证实。