Liu Xiangtong, Fine Jason Peter, Chen Zhenghong, Liu Long, Li Xia, Wang Anxin, Guo Jin, Tao Lixin, Mahara Gehendra, Tang Zhe, Guo Xiuhua
School of Public Health, Capital Medical University Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, Beijing, P.R. China Department of Biostatistics Department of Statistics & Operations Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Tiantanxili, Beijing, P.R. China The Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland Beijing Geriatric Clinical and Research Center, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, P.R. China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Oct;95(40):e5057. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005057.
The competing risk method has become more acceptable for time-to-event data analysis because of its advantage over the standard Cox model in accounting for competing events in the risk set. This study aimed to construct a prediction model for diabetes using a subdistribution hazards model.We prospectively followed 1857 community residents who were aged ≥ 55 years, free of diabetes at baseline examination from August 1992 to December 2012. Diabetes was defined as a self-reported history of diabetes diagnosis, taking antidiabetic medicine, or having fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 7.0 mmol/L. A questionnaire was used to measure diabetes risk factors, including dietary habits, lifestyle, psychological factors, cognitive function, and physical condition. Gray test and a subdistribution hazards model were used to construct a prediction algorithm for 20-year risk of diabetes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, bootstrap cross-validated Wolber concordance index (C-index) statistics, and calibration plots were used to assess model performance.During the 20-year follow-up period, 144 cases were documented for diabetes incidence with a median follow-up of 10.9 years (interquartile range: 8.0-15.3 years). The cumulative incidence function of 20-year diabetes incidence was 11.60% after adjusting for the competing risk of nondiabetes death. Gray test showed that body mass index, FPG, self-rated heath status, and physical activity were associated with the cumulative incidence function of diabetes after adjusting for age. Finally, 5 standard risk factors (poor self-rated health status [subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) = 1.73, P = 0.005], less physical activity [SHR = 1.39, P = 0.047], 55-65 years old [SHR = 4.37, P < 0.001], overweight [SHR = 2.15, P < 0.001] or obesity [SHR = 1.96, P = 0.003], and impaired fasting glucose [IFG] [SHR = 1.99, P < 0.001]) were significantly associated with incident diabetes. Model performance was moderate to excellent, as indicated by its bootstrap cross-validated discrimination C-index (0.74, 95% CI: 0.70-0.79) and calibration plot.Poor self-rated health, physical inactivity, being 55 to 65 years of age, overweight/obesity, and IFG were significant predictors of incident diabetes. Early prevention with a goal of achieving optimal levels of all risk factors should become a key element of diabetes prevention.
由于竞争风险法在考虑风险集中的竞争事件方面优于标准Cox模型,它在生存时间数据分析中已变得更易被接受。本研究旨在使用亚分布风险模型构建糖尿病预测模型。我们前瞻性地随访了1857名年龄≥55岁的社区居民,这些居民在1992年8月至2012年12月的基线检查时无糖尿病。糖尿病定义为自我报告的糖尿病诊断史、服用抗糖尿病药物或空腹血糖(FPG)≥7.0 mmol/L。使用问卷来测量糖尿病风险因素,包括饮食习惯、生活方式、心理因素、认知功能和身体状况。采用Gray检验和亚分布风险模型构建20年糖尿病风险的预测算法。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、自助法交叉验证的Wolber一致性指数(C指数)统计量和校准图来评估模型性能。在20年的随访期内,记录了144例糖尿病发病病例,中位随访时间为10.9年(四分位间距:8.0 - 15.3年)。在调整了非糖尿病死亡这一竞争风险后,20年糖尿病发病的累积发病率函数为11.60%。Gray检验表明,在调整年龄后体重指数、FPG、自我评定的健康状况和身体活动与糖尿病的累积发病率函数相关。最后,5个标准风险因素(自我评定健康状况差[亚分布风险比(SHR) = 1.73,P = 0.005]、身体活动较少[SHR = 1.39, P = 0.047]、55 - 65岁[SHR = 4.37, P < 0.001]、超重[SHR = 2.15, P < 0.001]或肥胖[SHR = 1.96, P = 0.003]以及空腹血糖受损[IFG][SHR = 1.99, P < 0.001])与糖尿病发病显著相关。如自助法交叉验证的区分C指数(0.74,95%可信区间:0.70 - 0.79)和校准图所示,模型性能为中等至优秀。自我评定健康状况差、身体不活动、年龄在55至65岁之间、超重/肥胖以及IFG是糖尿病发病的显著预测因素。以实现所有风险因素的最佳水平为目标的早期预防应成为糖尿病预防的关键要素。