Smektala Tomasz, Staniszewska Ewelina, Sławińska Agata, Sporniak-Tutak Katarzyna, Tutak Marcin, Jędrzejewski Marcin, Chrusciel-Nogalska Małgorzata, Olszewski Raphael
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Pomeranian Medical University, Powstańców Wlkp. 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Research Lab (OMFS/CHEX/IREC/SSS/UCL, Head: Pr Olszewski R, PhD), Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium ; Private Dental Practice, Aesthetic Dent, Szczecin, Poland.
Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Voivodeship Specialized Hospital, Szczecin, Poland.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2016 Sep;15(3):285-292. doi: 10.1007/s12663-015-0837-7. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
The aim of this study was to create an evidence-based three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of orbits in order to perform time-efficient measurements of postoperative orbital morphology changes.
The authors used 23 (11 bilateral and 1 unilateral) anatomical landmarks. Based on these, 6 planes, 12 angular and 16 linear measurements were determined. A three dimensional analysis was performed twice by two observers on pre and post-operative computed tomography scans of six patients who had undergone midface advancement. The mean, minimal and maximal difference, as well as standard deviation (SD) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the inter- and intra-observer landmark selection reliability were calculated. Additionally, the mean, minimal, maximal difference and standard deviation between pre- and post-operative angular and linear measurements were calculated to examine a connection between the established measurements and any morphological change.
The inter and intra-examiner accuracy of all landmarks for three axes was >0.9 ICC. Despite excellent inter and intra-examiner agreement (<2.49 mm ± 2.05 mm SD) for the landmark selection, linear and angular measurements showed a mismatch, the mean SD for angular measurements was found to be 8.2° and the linear 3.04 mm.
The possible causes of linear and angular measurement discrepancies are discussed and the future direction for the development of three-dimensional cephalometric analysis of orbits proposed.
本研究的目的是创建基于证据的眼眶三维头影测量分析方法,以便高效测量术后眼眶形态变化。
作者使用了23个(11对双侧和1个单侧)解剖标志点。基于这些标志点,确定了6个平面、12个角度和16个线性测量指标。两名观察者对6例接受面中部前移手术患者的术前和术后计算机断层扫描图像进行了两次三维分析。计算了观察者间和观察者内标志点选择可靠性的均值、最小和最大差异,以及标准差(SD)和组内相关系数(ICC)。此外,计算了术前和术后角度及线性测量的均值、最小、最大差异和标准差,以检验既定测量指标与任何形态变化之间的关联。
所有标志点在三个轴向上的观察者间和观察者内准确性的ICC均>0.9。尽管在标志点选择方面观察者间和观察者内的一致性极佳(标准差为2.49 mm±2.05 mm),但线性和角度测量结果存在不匹配,角度测量的平均标准差为8.2°,线性测量为3.04 mm。
讨论了线性和角度测量差异的可能原因,并提出了眼眶三维头影测量分析的未来发展方向。