Suppr超能文献

肠易激综合征患者中乳糜泻的筛查:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Screening for Celiac Disease in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Irvine Andrew J, Chey William D, Ford Alexander C

机构信息

Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

Leeds Institute of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan;112(1):65-76. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.466. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Celiac disease (CD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) share similar symptoms, leading to confusion between the two and diagnostic delay. International guidelines recommend screening individuals with IBS for CD, via serological testing. However, studies published recently have cast doubt on the utility of this. We updated a previous meta-analysis examining this issue.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and EMBASE Classic were searched through to May 2016. Eligible studies recruited adults with IBS according to symptom-based criteria, physician's opinion, or questionnaire data. Tests for CD included IgA-class antigliadin antibodies (AGA), endomysial antibodies (EMA), tissue transglutaminase antibodies (tTG), or duodenal biopsies following positive serology. The proportion of individuals meeting criteria for IBS testing positive for CD was combined to give a pooled prevalence for all studies, and compared between cases with IBS and, healthy controls without (where reported), using an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

There were 36 eligible studies, recruiting 15,256 individuals, of whom 9,275 (60.8%) met criteria for IBS. Pooled ORs for positive IgA AGAs, EMA and/or tTG, and biopsy-proven CD in IBS subjects vs. controls were 3.21 (95% CI 1.55-6.65), 2.75 (95% CI 1.35-5.61), and 4.48 (95% CI 2.33-8.60), respectively. There was no increase in ORs for any test for CD among cases with IBS in North American studies, and results were inconsistent in population-based studies. The prevalence of biopsy-proven CD was significantly higher across all subtypes of IBS. Limitations included heterogeneity in some analyses, and few North American studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, prevalence of positive celiac serology and biopsy-proven CD was significantly higher in subjects with symptoms suggestive of IBS vs. healthy controls. However, the utility of screening for CD in individuals with suspected IBS in North America or in the community is less clear.

摘要

目的

乳糜泻(CD)和肠易激综合征(IBS)有相似症状,导致两者易混淆且诊断延迟。国际指南建议通过血清学检测对IBS患者进行CD筛查。然而,最近发表的研究对其效用提出了质疑。我们更新了之前一项关于此问题的荟萃分析。

方法

检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和EMBASE Classic直至2016年5月。符合条件的研究根据基于症状的标准、医生意见或问卷数据招募患有IBS的成年人。CD检测包括IgA类抗麦胶蛋白抗体(AGA)、肌内膜抗体(EMA)、组织转谷氨酰胺酶抗体(tTG),或血清学阳性后的十二指肠活检。将符合IBS检测标准且CD检测呈阳性的个体比例合并,得出所有研究的合并患病率,并在患有IBS的病例与未患IBS的健康对照(如报告中有)之间进行比较,使用比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

有36项符合条件的研究,共招募了15256名个体,其中9275名(60.8%)符合IBS标准。IBS患者与对照组相比,IgA AGA、EMA和/或tTG呈阳性以及经活检证实为CD的合并OR分别为3.21(95%CI 1.55 - 6.65)、2.75(95%CI 1.35 - 5.61)和4.48(95%CI 2.33 - 8.60)。在北美研究中,IBS病例中任何CD检测的OR均未增加,且基于人群的研究结果不一致。在所有IBS亚型中,经活检证实的CD患病率显著更高。局限性包括某些分析存在异质性以及北美研究较少。

结论

总体而言,有IBS症状的受试者中,乳糜泻血清学阳性及经活检证实的CD患病率显著高于健康对照。然而,在北美或社区中对疑似IBS个体进行CD筛查的效用尚不清楚。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验