• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs)在剖宫产患者中的镇痛效果:一项荟萃分析。

The Analgesic Efficacy of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Agents (NSAIDs) in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Deliveries: A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Zeng Angela M, Nami Nina F, Wu Christopher L, Murphy Jamie D

机构信息

From the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University and School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Nov/Dec;41(6):763-772. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000460.

DOI:10.1097/AAP.0000000000000460
PMID:27755486
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Postoperative pain after cesarean delivery, which accounts for approximately 1 in 3 live births in the United States, can be severe in many patients. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) are potent analgesics that are effective in the treatment of postoperative pain. In this meta-analysis, we assessed the analgesic efficacy of NSAIDs in postoperative cesarean delivery patients.

METHODS

An electronic literature search of the Library of Medicine's PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and EMBASE databases was conducted in May 2013 and updated in January 2015 (Appendix, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/AAP/A174). Searches were limited to randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome variable was visual analog scale or numerical rating scale pain scores. Secondary outcomes included cumulative postoperative opioid consumption and opioid-related adverse effects (drowsiness/sedation, nausea, and vomiting). Data extraction was performed independently by 2 reviewers. Extracted data were input into Review Manager.

RESULTS

Twenty-two randomized controlled trials compared a NSAID (n = 639) to a control (n = 674). Patients in the NSAID group versus control reported lower pain scores at 12 hours (P = 0.003) and at 24 hours (P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed a significant difference in pain scores at 24 hours, with patients receiving NSAIDs via intravenous/intramuscular (P < 0.001) route, but not the oral (P = 0.39) or rectal routes (P = 0.99). Significantly lower average pain scores were reported for pain with movement at 24 hours in the NSAID group (P = 0.001). Patients in the NSAID group versus controls consumed significantly less opioids (P < 0.001) and had significantly less drowsiness/sedation (P = 0.03), but there was no significant difference between the groups with regard to nausea or vomiting (P = 0.48 and P = 0.17, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The perioperative use of NSAIDs in cesarean delivery patients will result in a significantly lower pain scores, less opioid consumption, and less drowsiness/sedation but no difference in nausea or vomiting compared to those who did not receive NSAIDs. Further research should address the optimal NSAID regimen and examine the effect of improved analgesia on patient-centered outcomes such as patient satisfaction and quality of breastfeeding.

摘要

背景与目的

剖宫产术后疼痛在美国约占每三例活产中的一例,许多患者的疼痛会很严重。非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs)是有效的镇痛药,对术后疼痛治疗有效。在这项荟萃分析中,我们评估了NSAIDs对剖宫产术后患者的镇痛效果。

方法

2013年5月对医学图书馆的PubMed、Cochrane CENTRAL、Scopus和EMBASE数据库进行了电子文献检索,并于2015年1月更新(附录,补充数字内容1,http://links.lww.com/AAP/A174)。检索限于随机对照试验。主要结局变量是视觉模拟量表或数字评定量表的疼痛评分。次要结局包括术后阿片类药物累计消耗量及阿片类药物相关不良反应(嗜睡/镇静、恶心和呕吐)。由2名审阅者独立进行数据提取。提取的数据输入Review Manager。

结果

22项随机对照试验比较了NSAIDs组(n = 639)和对照组(n = 674)。NSAIDs组患者与对照组相比,在12小时(P = 0.003)和24小时(P < 0.001)时疼痛评分更低。亚组分析显示,在24小时时疼痛评分有显著差异,接受静脉/肌肉注射(P < 0.001)途径NSAIDs的患者有差异,但口服(P = 0.39)或直肠途径(P = 0.99)的患者无差异。NSAIDs组在24小时时活动时疼痛的平均评分显著更低(P = 0.001)。NSAIDs组患者与对照组相比消耗的阿片类药物显著更少(P < 0.001),嗜睡/镇静显著更少(P = 0.03),但两组在恶心或呕吐方面无显著差异(分别为P = 0.48和P = 0.17)。

结论

与未接受NSAIDs的剖宫产患者相比,围手术期使用NSAIDs可使疼痛评分显著降低、阿片类药物消耗量减少、嗜睡/镇静减少,但在恶心或呕吐方面无差异。进一步的研究应探讨最佳NSAIDs方案,并研究改善镇痛对以患者为中心的结局(如患者满意度和母乳喂养质量)的影响。

相似文献

1
The Analgesic Efficacy of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Agents (NSAIDs) in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Deliveries: A Meta-Analysis.非甾体类抗炎药(NSAIDs)在剖宫产患者中的镇痛效果:一项荟萃分析。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Nov/Dec;41(6):763-772. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000460.
2
Analgesia for patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy for urinary stones - a systematic review and meta-analysis.尿路结石患者体外冲击波碎石术的镇痛——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int Braz J Urol. 2017 May-Jun;43(3):394-406. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0078.
3
Codeine-acetaminophen versus nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of post-abdominal surgery pain: a systematic review of randomized trials.可待因-对乙酰氨基酚与非甾体抗炎药治疗腹部手术后疼痛的比较:随机试验的系统评价
Am J Surg. 2009 Aug;198(2):256-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.11.044.
4
Impact of a multimodal analgesic protocol modification on opioid consumption after cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study.多模式镇痛方案修改对剖宫产术后阿片类药物消耗的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(24):4743-4749. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1863364. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
5
Perioperative gabapentin and post cesarean pain control: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.围手术期加巴喷丁与剖宫产术后疼痛控制:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Feb;233:98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.11.026. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
6
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) versus opioids for acute renal colic.非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)与阿片类药物治疗急性肾绞痛的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD004137. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004137.pub2.
7
Perioperative Opioid-sparing Strategies: Utility of Conventional NSAIDs in Adults.围手术期阿片类药物节约策略:成人中常规 NSAIDs 的效用。
Clin Ther. 2019 Dec;41(12):2612-2628. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
8
Patient-Controlled Analgesia Plus Background Opioid Infusion for Postoperative Pain in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.患者自控镇痛联合背景阿片类药物输注用于儿童术后疼痛:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Anesth Analg. 2016 Oct;123(4):991-1003. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001244.
9
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) versus opioids for acute renal colic.非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)与阿片类药物治疗急性肾绞痛的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;2004(2):CD004137. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004137.pub3.
10
Paracetamol and selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for the reduction of morphine-related side effects after major surgery: a systematic review.对乙酰氨基酚与选择性和非选择性非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)用于减少大手术后与吗啡相关的副作用:系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 Mar;14(17):1-153, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta14170.

引用本文的文献

1
Drug Ropivacaine in Bilateral Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Versus Intramuscular Diclofenac Injection for Post-Caesarean Analgesia: Comparing New Method with Traditional One.剖宫产术后镇痛:罗哌卡因双侧腹横肌平面阻滞与双氯芬酸肌内注射对比——新方法与传统方法比较
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2025 Jun;75(3):233-237. doi: 10.1007/s13224-025-02110-y. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
2
Consensus Statement on Pain Management for Pregnant Patients with Opioid-Use Disorder from the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.来自产科麻醉与围产医学会、母胎医学会以及美国区域麻醉与疼痛医学学会的关于阿片类物质使用障碍孕妇疼痛管理的共识声明。
Anesth Analg. 2024 Nov 6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007237.
3
Risk of short-term cardiovascular disease in relation to the mode of delivery in singleton pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study.单胎妊娠分娩方式与短期心血管疾病风险:一项回顾性队列研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Sep 26;76:102851. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102851. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
The crosstalk between subjective fibromyalgia, mental health symptoms and the use of over-the-counter analgesics in female Syrian refugees: a cross-sectional web-based study.主观纤维肌痛、心理健康症状与女性叙利亚难民使用非处方镇痛药之间的相互作用:一项基于网络的横断面研究。
Rheumatol Int. 2024 Apr;44(4):715-723. doi: 10.1007/s00296-023-05521-0. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
5
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug "allergy" labeling is associated with increased postpartum opioid utilization.非甾体抗炎药的“过敏”标签与产后阿片类药物使用增加有关。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 Mar;153(3):772-779.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.11.025. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
6
Comparison of different nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for cesarean section: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.不同非甾体抗炎药在剖宫产中的应用比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2023 Dec;76(6):597-616. doi: 10.4097/kja.23014. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
7
Analgesia after cesarean section - what is new?剖宫产术后镇痛——有哪些新进展?
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2023 Jun 1;36(3):288-292. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001259. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
8
Clinical characteristics and sequelae of intrapartum hypertension - a retrospective cohort study.分娩期高血压的临床特征及后遗症:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Mar 6;23(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05386-y.
9
Comparison of 2 anesthetic protocols and surgical timing during cesarean section on neonatal vitality and umbilical cord blood parameters.剖宫产术中 2 种麻醉方案和手术时机对新生儿活力及脐血参数的比较。
BMC Vet Res. 2023 Feb 13;19(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12917-023-03607-2.
10
Analgesic outcomes of tramadol alone and in combination with Butorphanol or Flurbiprofen Axetil after cesarean section: a retrospective study with propensity score matching analysis.曲马多单用与联合布托啡诺或氟比洛芬酯用于剖宫产术后镇痛的效果比较:一项基于倾向评分匹配分析的回顾性研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 Dec 16;22(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01939-4.