Danner Nadja, Molitor Anna Maria, Schiele Susanne, Härtel Stephan, Steffan-Dewenter Ingolf
Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074, Würzburg, Germany.
Ecol Appl. 2016 Sep;26(6):1920-1929. doi: 10.1890/15-1840.1.
Honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) show a large variation in foraging distances and use a broad range of plant species as pollen resources, even in regions with intensive agriculture. However, it is unknown how increasing areas of mass-flowering crops like oilseed rape (Brassica napus; OSR) or a decrease of seminatural habitats (SNH) change the temporal and spatial availability of pollen resources for honey bee colonies, and thus foraging distances and frequency in different habitat types. We studied pollen foraging of honey bee colonies in 16 agricultural landscapes with independent gradients of OSR and SNH area within 2 km and used waggle dances and digital geographic maps with major land cover types to reveal the distance and visited habitat type on a landscape level. Mean pollen foraging distance of 1347 decoded bee dances was 1015 m (± 26 m; SEM). In spring, increasing area of flowering OSR within 2 km reduced mean pollen foraging distances from 1324 m to only 435 m. In summer, increasing cover of SNH areas close to the colonies (within 200 m radius) reduced mean pollen foraging distances from 846 to 469 m. Frequency of pollen foragers per habitat type, measured as the number of dances per hour and hectare, was equally high for SNH, grassland, and OSR fields, but lower for other crops and forests. In landscapes with a small proportion of SNH a significantly higher density of pollen foragers on SNH was observed, indicating that pollen resources in such simple agricultural landscapes are more limited. Overall, we conclude that SNH and mass-flowering crops can reduce foraging distances of honey bee colonies at different scales and seasons with possible benefits for the performance of honey bee colonies. Further, mixed agricultural landscapes with a high proportion of SNH reduce foraging densities of honey bees in SNH and thus possible competition for pollen resources.
蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)的觅食距离差异很大,即使在集约农业地区,它们也会利用多种植物作为花粉来源。然而,尚不清楚诸如油菜(甘蓝型油菜)等大面积开花作物种植面积的增加或半自然栖息地面积的减少如何改变蜂群花粉资源的时空可利用性,进而影响不同栖息地类型中的觅食距离和频率。我们在16个农业景观中研究了蜂群的花粉采集情况,这些景观中2公里范围内油菜和半自然栖息地面积呈独立梯度变化,并使用摆尾舞和包含主要土地覆盖类型的数字地理地图来揭示景观层面的觅食距离和所访问的栖息地类型。对1347次已解码的蜜蜂摆尾舞进行分析,平均花粉觅食距离为1015米(±26米;标准误)。春季,2公里范围内开花油菜面积的增加使平均花粉觅食距离从1324米降至仅435米。夏季,靠近蜂群(半径200米范围内)半自然栖息地面积的增加使平均花粉觅食距离从846米降至469米。以每小时每公顷的摆尾舞次数衡量,半自然栖息地、草地和油菜田的每种栖息地类型中花粉采集者的频率相当高,但其他作物和森林的频率较低。在半自然栖息地比例较小的景观中,观察到半自然栖息地的花粉采集者密度显著更高,这表明在这种简单的农业景观中花粉资源更为有限。总体而言,我们得出结论,半自然栖息地和大面积开花作物可以在不同尺度和季节减少蜂群的觅食距离,这可能对蜂群的表现有益。此外,半自然栖息地比例高的混合农业景观会降低蜜蜂在半自然栖息地的觅食密度,从而减少对花粉资源的潜在竞争。