UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, 329 Beard Hall, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
BMC Med Educ. 2018 May 3;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1203-5.
The multiple mini-interview (MMI) is a common assessment strategy used in student selection. The MMI as an assessment strategy within a health professions curriculum, however, has not been previously studied. This study describes the integration of a 5-station MMI as part of an end-of-year capstone following the first year of a health professions curriculum. The goal of the capstone MMI was to assess professional competencies of students and to offer formative feedback to prepare students for their upcoming clinical practice experiences. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of an MMI integrated into a health professions curriculum.
Five capstone MMI stations were designed to each evaluate a single construct assessed by one rater. A principal component analysis (PCA) was used to evaluate the structure of the model and its ability to distinguish 5 separate constructs. A Multifaceted Rasch Measurement (MFRM) model assessed student performance and estimated the sources of measurement error attributed to 3 facets: student ability, rater stringency, and station difficulty. At the conclusion, students were surveyed about the capstone MMI experience.
The PCA confirmed the MMI reliably assessed 5 unique constructs and performance on each station was not strongly correlated with one another. The 3-facet MFRM analysis explained 58.79% of the total variance in student scores. Specifically, 29.98% of the variance reflected student ability, 20.25% reflected rater stringency, and 8.56% reflected station difficulty. Overall, the data demonstrated an acceptable fit to the MFRM model. The majority of students agreed the MMI allowed them to effectively demonstrate their communication (80.82%), critical thinking (78.77%), and collaboration skills (70.55%).
The MMI can be a valuable assessment strategy of professional competence within a health professions curriculum. These findings suggest the MMI is well-received by students and can produce reliable results. Future research should explore the impact of using the MMI as a strategy to monitor longitudinal competency development and inform feedback approaches.
多站迷你面试(MMI)是学生选拔中常用的评估策略。然而,在健康职业课程中,MMI 作为一种评估策略尚未得到研究。本研究描述了将 5 站 MMI 整合到健康职业课程的年终综合课程中。综合课程 MMI 的目标是评估学生的专业能力,并提供形成性反馈,为他们即将进行的临床实践经验做好准备。本研究的目的是评估整合到健康职业课程中的 MMI 的心理测量学特性。
设计了 5 个综合课程 MMI 站,每个站评估一个由一名评估员评估的单一结构。使用主成分分析(PCA)评估模型的结构及其区分 5 个独立结构的能力。多方面的拉斯克测量(MFRM)模型评估了学生的表现,并估计了归因于 3 个方面的测量误差来源:学生能力、评估员严格程度和站点难度。在结束时,学生们对综合课程 MMI 体验进行了调查。
PCA 证实 MMI 可靠地评估了 5 个独特的结构,每个站点的表现彼此之间没有很强的相关性。3 方面 MFRM 分析解释了学生成绩总方差的 58.79%。具体而言,29.98%的方差反映了学生的能力,20.25%反映了评估员的严格程度,8.56%反映了站点的难度。总体而言,数据与 MFRM 模型拟合良好。大多数学生同意 MMI 使他们能够有效地展示他们的沟通(80.82%)、批判性思维(78.77%)和协作技能(70.55%)。
MMI 可以成为健康职业课程中专业能力的有价值的评估策略。这些发现表明,MMI 深受学生欢迎,并且可以产生可靠的结果。未来的研究应探讨使用 MMI 作为监测纵向能力发展和提供反馈方法的策略的影响。