• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为药学硕士学位课程制定评估流程。

Developing an Assessment Process for a Master's of Science Degree in a Pharmaceutical Sciences Program.

作者信息

Bloom Timothy J, Hall Julie M, Liu Qinfeng, Stagner William C, Adams Michael L

机构信息

Campbell University College of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, Buies Creek, North Carolina.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Sep 25;80(7):125. doi: 10.5688/ajpe807125.

DOI:10.5688/ajpe807125
PMID:27756933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5066928/
Abstract

To develop a program-level assessment process for a master's of science degree in a pharmaceutical sciences (MSPS) program. Program-level goals were created and mapped to course learning objectives. Embedded assessment tools were created by each course director and used to gather information related to program-level goals. Initial assessment iterations involved a subset of offered courses, and course directors met with the department assessment committee to review the quality of the assessment tools as well as the data collected with them. Insights from these discussions were used to improve the process. When all courses were used for collecting program-level assessment data, a modified system of guided reflection was used to reduce demands on committee members. The first two iterations of collecting program-level assessment revealed problems with both the assessment tools and the program goals themselves. Course directors were inconsistent in the Bloom's Taxonomy level at which they assessed student achievement of program goals. Moreover, inappropriate mapping of program goals to course learning objectives were identified. These issues led to unreliable measures of how well students were doing with regard to program-level goals. Peer discussions between course directors and the assessment committee led to modification of program goals as well as improved assessment data collection tools. By starting with a subset of courses and using course-embedded assessment tools, a program-level assessment process was created with little difficulty. Involving all faculty members and avoiding comparisons between courses made obtaining faculty buy-in easier. Peer discussion often resulted in consensus on how to improve assessment tools.

摘要

为药学硕士学位(MSPS)项目制定一个项目层面的评估流程。制定了项目层面的目标,并将其映射到课程学习目标。每个课程主任创建了嵌入式评估工具,用于收集与项目层面目标相关的信息。初始评估迭代涉及部分提供的课程,课程主任与系评估委员会会面,以审查评估工具的质量以及使用这些工具收集的数据。这些讨论的见解被用于改进流程。当所有课程都用于收集项目层面的评估数据时,采用了一种改进的引导式反思系统,以减轻委员会成员的负担。收集项目层面评估的前两轮迭代揭示了评估工具和项目目标本身存在的问题。课程主任在评估学生对项目目标的达成情况时,在布鲁姆教育目标分类法的水平上不一致。此外,还发现项目目标与课程学习目标的映射不合适。这些问题导致无法可靠地衡量学生在项目层面目标方面的表现。课程主任与评估委员会之间的同行讨论导致了项目目标的修改以及评估数据收集工具的改进。通过从部分课程开始并使用嵌入式课程评估工具,几乎没有困难地创建了一个项目层面的评估流程。让所有教师参与并避免课程之间的比较使得更容易获得教师的认可。同行讨论经常就如何改进评估工具达成共识。

相似文献

1
Developing an Assessment Process for a Master's of Science Degree in a Pharmaceutical Sciences Program.为药学硕士学位课程制定评估流程。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Sep 25;80(7):125. doi: 10.5688/ajpe807125.
2
Strengthening pharmaceutical care education in Ethiopia through instructional collaboration.通过教学合作加强埃塞俄比亚的药学服务教育。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Sep 10;75(7):134. doi: 10.5688/ajpe757134.
3
Competency, Programming, and Emerging Innovation in Graduate Education within Schools of Pharmacy: The Report of the 2016-2017 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee.药学研究生院的能力、规划和新兴创新:2016-2017 年研究与研究生事务委员会报告。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 Oct;81(8):S11. doi: 10.5688/ajpeS11.
4
An innovative seminar course in business etiquette for pharmacy graduate students.面向药学研究生的商务礼仪创新研讨课程。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 Nov 12;76(9):177. doi: 10.5688/ajpe769177.
5
Graphic strategies for analyzing and interpreting curricular mapping data.图形化策略在课程图分析与解释中的应用。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Jun 15;74(5). doi: 10.5688/aj740581.
6
A New Master's Degree in Global Health: Reflections on a 5-year Experience.全球健康新硕士学位:5 年经验反思。
Ann Glob Health. 2015 Sep-Oct;81(5):618-26. doi: 10.1016/j.aogh.2015.10.006.
7
Implementation of a Continuing Professional Development Course in a Longitudinal Didactic Curriculum for Pharmacy Students.在药学学生的纵向教学课程中实施继续教育课程。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Oct;83(8):7013. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7013.
8
Formative Evaluation of Using Action Learning in a Master of Medical Education Assessment and Measurement Course.在医学教育评估与测量硕士课程中运用行动学习的形成性评价
Cureus. 2022 Jul 3;14(7):e26523. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26523. eCollection 2022 Jul.
9
Core competencies for research training in the clinical pharmaceutical sciences.临床药学科学研究培训的核心能力。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Mar 10;75(2):27. doi: 10.5688/ajpe75227.
10
Structured academic discussions through an online education-specific platform to improve Pharm.D. students learning outcomes.通过一个专门针对在线教育的平台进行结构化学术讨论,以提高药学博士学生的学习成果。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Mar-Apr;9(2):230-236. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2016.11.022. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Curriculum, competency development, and assessment methods of MSc and PhD pharmacy programs: a scoping review.理学硕士和博士药学课程的课程设置、能力发展和评估方法:范围综述。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 11;24(1):989. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05820-5.
2
Exploring the Future of Graduate Education in Pharmaceutical Fields.探索药学领域研究生教育的未来。
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Dec 3;30(1):75-79. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00882-3. eCollection 2020 Mar.
3
Breaking Down Barriers to Pharmacy Graduate Education: The Report of the 2017-2018 Research and Graduate Affairs Committee.打破药学研究生教育障碍:2017-2018 年研究与研究生事务委员会报告。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Sep;82(7):7147. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7147.

本文引用的文献

1
Program assessment: enough or too much?项目评估:足够还是过多?
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Nov 12;77(9):185. doi: 10.5688/ajpe779185.
2
Finding and using readily available sources of assessment data.寻找并使用现成的评估数据来源。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2008 Oct 15;72(5):102. doi: 10.5688/aj7205102.
3
Programmatic curricular outcomes assessment at colleges and schools of pharmacy in the United States and Puerto Rico.美国和波多黎各药学院校的课程成果评估规划
Am J Pharm Educ. 2006 Feb 15;70(1):8. doi: 10.5688/aj700108.