Pichi Francesco, Carrai Paola, Ciardella Antonio, Behar-Cohen Francine, Nucci Paolo
Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
San Giuseppe Hospital, University Eye Clinic, Milan, Italy.
Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;37(5):1115-1125. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0377-2. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of oral spironolactone and eplerenone, two specific antagonists of the mineralocorticoid receptor, in central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR). METHODS: In this prospective, placebo-controlled trial, sixty patients with persistent CSCR were assigned to three treatment group. Twenty patients in Group 1 were treated with 25 mg of spironolactone (Aldactone; Pfizer) for 1 week, then increased to 50 mg for the following 3 weeks, then shifted to eplerenone 50 mg for 1 month. Twenty patients in Group 2 were treated with 25 mg of eplerenone (Inspra; Pfizer) for 1 week, then increased to 50 mg for the following 3 weeks, and then shifted to spironolactone 50 mg for 1 month. Twenty patients in Group 3 were treated with 1 placebo control tablet for 1 week, then increased to two tablets for the following 3 weeks, and then shifted to spironolactone 50 mg for 1 month. At the end of the second month, all the treatments were stopped, and the patients were followed for two additional months. Primary outcome measure was a change in BCVA at 1, 2, and 4 months. Secondary outcome was a change of >20 % in the size of SRF recorded with OCT at 1, 2, and 4 months of treatment. RESULTS: In terms of BCVA, treatment in Group 1 was effective from the first month (spironolactone, p value 0.01), and in Group 2 effective from the second month (shift to spironolactone, p value 0.004). Since the p value after the first month was 0.2 in Group 2, even with a larger sample, it would be difficult to see an efficacy of an eplerenone treatment after 1 month. As for the SRF, both in Group 1 and Group 2, both treatments were found to be equally effective after 1 month of administration (p values 0.004). At 4 months, only in Group 3, there was no statistical improvement of BCVA and SRF (p values 0.09 and 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Spironolactone is statistically superior to eplerenone in improving BCVA of patients with CSCR, while both drugs can be considered equally effective in promoting the reabsorption of SRF.
目的:评估盐皮质激素受体的两种特异性拮抗剂——口服螺内酯和依普利酮对中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(CSCR)的疗效。 方法:在这项前瞻性、安慰剂对照试验中,60例持续性CSCR患者被分为三个治疗组。第1组20例患者先服用25mg螺内酯(安体舒通;辉瑞公司)1周,然后在接下来的3周内增至50mg,之后换用50mg依普利酮治疗1个月。第2组20例患者先服用25mg依普利酮( Inspra;辉瑞公司)1周,然后在接下来的3周内增至50mg,之后换用50mg螺内酯治疗1个月。第3组20例患者先服用1片安慰剂对照片1周,然后在接下来的3周内增至2片,之后换用50mg螺内酯治疗1个月。在第二个月末,所有治疗均停止,患者再随访2个月。主要观察指标为1、2和4个月时最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的变化。次要观察指标为治疗1、2和4个月时,光学相干断层扫描(OCT)记录的视网膜下液(SRF)大小变化>20%。 结果:就BCVA而言,第1组从第一个月起治疗有效(螺内酯,p值0.01),第2组从第二个月起有效(换用螺内酯,p值0.004)。由于第2组第一个月后的p值为0.2,即使样本量更大,也很难看出依普利酮治疗1个月后的疗效。至于SRF,第1组和第2组在给药1个月后,两种治疗均被发现同样有效(p值0.004)。在4个月时,仅第3组的BCVA和SRF无统计学改善(p值0.09和0.5)。 结论:在改善CSCR患者的BCVA方面,螺内酯在统计学上优于依普利酮,而两种药物在促进SRF重吸收方面可被认为同样有效。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016-11
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019-11-1
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017-2
Br J Ophthalmol. 2018-10-24
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-6-16
Eye (Lond). 2023-11
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023-8
Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2022-11-28
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2022-6-7
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2015-5-27
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012-9-21
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012-10-17
J Clin Invest. 2012-6-11
Br J Ophthalmol. 2011-11-3