Suppr超能文献

比较中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变随机对照试验的治疗结果。

Comparing treatment outcomes in randomized controlled trials of central serous chorioretinopathy.

机构信息

Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA.

Nilima Sinha Medical College & Hospital, Rampur, Madhepura, Bihar, India.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug;261(8):2135-2168. doi: 10.1007/s00417-023-05996-4. Epub 2023 Mar 2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To perform a qualitative analysis of outcomes published from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) from 1979 to 2022.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

All RCTs (including both therapeutic and non-therapeutic interventions) on CSCR available online till July 2022 were included after an electronic search in multiple databases such as PubMed, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, BIOSIS, Scopus, and Cochrane database. We analyzed and compared the inclusion criteria, imaging modalities, study endpoints, duration, and the results of the study.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 498 potential publications. After excluding duplicate studies and studies that met clear exclusion criteria, 64 were screened for further evaluation, of which 7 were removed due to a lack of necessary inclusion criteria. A total of 57 eligible studies are described in this review.

CONCLUSION

This review provides a comparative overview of key outcomes reported between RCTs investigating CSCR. We describe the current landscape of treatment modalities for CSCR and note the discrepancies between results in these published studies. Challenges arise when attempting to compare similar study designs without comparable outcome measures (i.e., clinical vs. structural) which may limit the overall evidence presented. To mitigate this issue, we present the collected data from each study in tables detailing the measures that are and are not assessed in each publication.

摘要

目的

对 1979 年至 2022 年期间发表的关于中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变(CSCR)的随机对照试验(RCT)的结果进行定性分析。

设计

系统评价。

方法

在多个数据库(如 PubMed、CENTRAL、MEDLINE、EMBASE、BIOSIS、Scopus 和 Cochrane 数据库)中进行电子检索,纳入所有关于 CSCR 的 RCT(包括治疗性和非治疗性干预措施)。我们分析并比较了纳入标准、成像方式、研究终点、持续时间和研究结果。

结果

文献检索得到了 498 篇潜在的出版物。在排除重复研究和符合明确排除标准的研究后,对 64 篇研究进行了进一步评估,其中 7 篇因缺乏必要的纳入标准而被排除。本综述共描述了 57 项符合条件的研究。

结论

本综述提供了对 CSCR 研究中报告的关键结果的比较概述。我们描述了 CSCR 治疗方法的现状,并注意到这些已发表研究结果之间的差异。当试图比较没有可比结局指标(即临床与结构)的相似研究设计时,会出现挑战,这可能会限制呈现的总体证据。为了解决这个问题,我们在表格中详细列出了每个研究中收集的数据,说明每个出版物评估和未评估的措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验