Górska Katarzyna, Nejman-Gryz Patrycja, Paplińska-Goryca Magdalena, Proboszcz Małgorzata, Krenke Rafał
Department of Internal Medicine, Pneumology and Allergology, Medical University of Warsaw, 1A Banacha Street, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;955:19-27. doi: 10.1007/5584_2016_162.
Thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) seems a promising asthma biomarker. In earlier studies, mainly the serum concentration of TSLP was investigated. The aim of the present study was to compare the TSLP concentration measured by two different ELISA kits in the serum, induced sputum, and exhaled breath condensate in asthma, COPD, and control subjects. The study included 24 asthmatics, 36 patients with COPD, and 12 controls. TSLP concentration was measured with the use of R&D and EIAab commercial ELISA kits. The results obtained with the EIAab kit were 3 to even 45-fold higher than those measured with the R&D kit. Significant differences between the investigated groups were found only for the TSLP concentration in induced sputum. When the R&D kit was used, the highest TSLP levels in induced sputum were found in asthmatics, while the EIAab kit showed the highest TSLP levels in controls. The distribution of results in the Bland-Altman plot was typical for a proportional constant error. TSP concentration in induced sputum might be a more reliable asthma biomarker than serum TSLP. We conclude that TSLP level is highly dependent on the ELISA kit used for the measurement. Thus, judgement on TSLP results obtained with different assays might be confusing and lead to wrong conclusions.
胸腺基质淋巴细胞生成素(TSLP)似乎是一种很有前景的哮喘生物标志物。在早期研究中,主要研究的是TSLP的血清浓度。本研究的目的是比较两种不同酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)试剂盒在哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者及对照者血清、诱导痰和呼出气冷凝物中所测得的TSLP浓度。该研究纳入了24例哮喘患者、36例COPD患者和12例对照者。使用R&D和艾美捷科技有限公司(EIAab)的商用ELISA试剂盒测定TSLP浓度。用EIAab试剂盒测得的结果比用R&D试剂盒测得的结果高3至45倍。仅在诱导痰中的TSLP浓度方面发现了各研究组之间的显著差异。当使用R&D试剂盒时,诱导痰中TSLP水平最高的是哮喘患者,而使用EIAab试剂盒时,对照组的TSLP水平最高。Bland-Altman图中的结果分布是典型的比例恒定误差。诱导痰中的TSP浓度可能是比血清TSLP更可靠的哮喘生物标志物。我们得出结论,TSLP水平高度依赖于用于测量的ELISA试剂盒。因此,对不同检测方法所获得的TSLP结果进行判断可能会令人困惑并导致错误结论。