Computational Systems Chemistry, School of Chemistry, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
J Comput Chem. 2016 Dec 15;37(32):2749-2758. doi: 10.1002/jcc.24500. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
The effects of electronic polarization in biomolecular interactions will differ depending on the local dielectric constant of the environment, such as in solvent, DNA, proteins, and membranes. Here the performance of the AMOEBA polarizable force field is evaluated under nonaqueous conditions by calculating the solvation free energies of small molecules in four common organic solvents. Results are compared with experimental data and equivalent simulations performed with the GAFF pairwise-additive force field. Although AMOEBA results give mean errors close to "chemical accuracy," GAFF performs surprisingly well, with statistically significantly more accurate results than AMOEBA in some solvents. However, for both models, free energies calculated in chloroform show worst agreement to experiment and individual solutes are consistently poor performers, suggesting non-potential-specific errors also contribute to inaccuracy. Scope for the improvement of both potentials remains limited by the lack of high quality experimental data across multiple solvents, particularly those of high dielectric constant. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Computational Chemistry Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
生物分子相互作用中的电子极化效应将根据环境的局部介电常数而有所不同,例如在溶剂、DNA、蛋白质和膜中。本文通过计算小分子在四种常见有机溶剂中的溶剂化自由能,评估了 AMOEBA 极化力场在非水条件下的性能。结果与实验数据以及使用 GAFF 对加和力场进行的等效模拟进行了比较。尽管 AMOEBA 的结果给出了接近“化学精度”的平均误差,但 GAFF 的表现却出人意料地好,在一些溶剂中,其结果比 AMOEBA 具有统计学上更准确。然而,对于这两种模型,在氯仿中计算的自由能与实验结果的吻合度最差,而且个别溶质的表现一直很差,这表明非势能特异性误差也会导致精度降低。由于缺乏跨多种溶剂的高质量实验数据,特别是高介电常数溶剂的数据,因此这两种势的改进空间仍然有限。© 2016 作者。美国化学学会出版的《计算机化学杂志》。