Mangel Marc
Ecol Appl. 1993 May;3(2):221-229. doi: 10.2307/1941825.
The United Nations (U.N.) resolutions concerning high-seas driftnets called for moratoria by July 1992, unless appropriate conservation measures could be enacted. The analyses presented here show that the population of northern right whale dolphin has been affected by driftnets and that no apparent conservation measures are available. A number of points emerge: (1) Simple "worst-case" estimates of depletion highlight the importance of accurate estimates of population abundance. Current abundance is 24-73% of the abundance in 1978, depending upon which estimate of current population is assumed. The enormous variability associated with the estimates of current population size will create difficulties for "statistically sound analysis" of management plans, as called for by the U.N. resolutions. In addition, depletion caused by high-seas driftnet fisheries could even be greater than the worst-case estimate reported at a scientific review in June 1991 (Anonymous 1991). (2) The catches of driftnets are highly aggregated. Reporting a kill rate of a fraction of an animal per unit of effort assumes that driftnets "cull" the population of animals and masks the more important effect of large, simultaneous kills of large fractions of pods, families, or other reproductive units. In addition, aggregated catches may lead to underestimates of the necessary level of observer effort. However, the operational characteristics of high-seas driftnet fisheries make impossible any management or conservation plan in which highly aggregated catches do not occur. (3) Any "statistically sound analysis" must include discussion of statistical power. To date, this has not been done. The importance of statistical power is that it places the burden of proof upon the fishing nations that wish to claim either no effect or a successful management plan. In summary, this study of northern right whale dolphin illustrates the following broad points concerning resource protection and conservation: abundance estimates (or trends in abundance) are key to advising on the problem, the statistical characterization of the data must take into account the observed patterns, and statistical power needs to be evaluated to clarify results.
联合国关于公海流网的决议要求在1992年7月前暂停使用,除非能够制定适当的养护措施。此处给出的分析表明,北露脊海豚种群已受到流网影响,且尚无明显的养护措施。由此得出几点:(1)简单的“最坏情况”枯竭估计凸显了准确估计种群数量的重要性。当前数量是1978年数量的24% - 73%,具体取决于所采用的当前种群估计值。与当前种群规模估计相关的巨大变异性将给联合国决议所要求的管理计划的“统计合理分析”带来困难。此外,公海流网渔业造成的枯竭甚至可能大于1991年6月一次科学审查中报告的最坏情况估计(匿名,1991年)。(2)流网捕捞量高度集中。报告每单位努力捕捞不到一只动物的捕杀率,意味着假定流网对动物种群进行“筛选”,掩盖了同时大量捕杀大部分鲸群、家族或其他繁殖单位的更重要影响。此外,集中捕捞量可能导致对必要观察力度的低估。然而,公海流网渔业的作业特点使得任何管理或养护计划都无法避免高度集中的捕捞量。(3)任何“统计合理分析”都必须包括对统计功效的讨论。迄今为止,尚未做到这一点。统计功效的重要性在于,它将举证责任置于那些声称无影响或管理计划成功的捕鱼国家身上。总之,这项对北露脊海豚的研究说明了关于资源保护和养护的以下要点:数量估计(或数量趋势)是解决问题的关键,数据的统计特征必须考虑观察到的模式,并且需要评估统计功效以阐明结果。