• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度未控制高血压患者的管理实践

Management Practices in Indian Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension.

作者信息

Bharatia Rajkumar, Chitale Manoj, Saxena Ganesh Narain, Kumar Raman Ganesh, Trailokya Abhijit, Dalvi Kalpesh, Talele Suhas

机构信息

The Apollo Clinic, Guwahati, Assam.

Consultant, Shree Clinic, Nashik, Maharashtra.

出版信息

J Assoc Physicians India. 2016 Jul;64(7):14-21.

PMID:27759337
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hypertension (HTN), being a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), is an important issue of medical and public health. High blood pressure (BP) is ranked as the third most important risk factor for attributable burden of disease in south Asia (2010). Hypertension (HTN) exerts a substantial public health burden on cardiovascular health status and healthcare systems in India. Uncontrolled hypertension among adults with hypertension is associated with increased mortality. An inadequate data is available in India on uncontrolled hypertension.

OBJECTIVES

The present study was planned to evaluate the patient profile, co-morbidities, management in uncontrolled hypertensive patients and also to determine the number of patients with resistant hypertension across India.

METHODS

A total of 4725 uncontrolled hypertensive patients who were on anti-hypertensive medications were evaluated in this cross-sectional and observational study. The observed patterns were recorded with respect to the prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension and evaluate the socio-demographic, medical history, anthropometric variables and treatment preferences in Indian patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

RESULTS

Majority of the patients with uncontrolled hypertension were males (71.4%) and aged 46-65 years. Most of the study population were pre-obese (males: 35.7%; females: 27.4%). Higher proportion of patients with uncontrolled hypertension were residents of Maharashtra (25.6%) and Gujarat (11.6%). Antihypertensive monotherapy was used by 45.4% and 54.6% patients used combination therapy (≥ 2 categories of anti-hypertensive medications). Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) were the most preferred agent as monotherapy (70.6%) and also the most common component of dual and triple combination anti-hypertensive agent. 19.5% (922/4725) patients had resistant hypertension and 80% of the patients were aged 46-65 years. Higher proportion of patients were males (67.2%; 620/922) and higher proportion of patients were to residents of Andhra Pradesh (21.4% patients) and Maharashtra (19.3% patients). All 922 resistant hypertensive patients were on ≥ 3 anti-hypertensive medications and received ARB + CCB + Diuretics as the most preferred anti-hypertensive combination therapy. Diabetes and dyslipidaemia were the major comorbidities reported in patients with uncontrolled and resistant hypertension. Lipid lowering agents followed by oral hypoglycaemic agents and antiplatelet medications were the common concomitant medications used. Various factor responsible for not achieving the desired blood pressure goals may be the physician's lack of awareness about recent hypertensive treatment guidelines that might contribute to patient's poor adherence due to not explaining adequately the benefit and risks of a medication, not giving consideration to the patient's life style, the cost of medication, and inadequate dose titration.

CONCLUSIONS

Uncontrolled hypertension is a major problem in India. It is prudent to focus on multiple risk factors while treating hypertension. A combination therapy with multiple blood pressure lowering drugs are important and concerns should be identified while selecting the appropriate dosage of combinations of anti-hypertensive therapy and adherence to the therapy. The preferred choices for mono, dual combination and triple combination anti-hypertensive regimens are ARBs; ARB + CCB; ARB + CCB + Diuretics, respectively. In this study, most of the patients were on monotherapy; however a rationale combination therapy or dose adjustment is required for the effective management of hypertension. The protective measures to be taken to control hypertension includes reduction of physicians inertia, diet and physical activity, regular patient follow-up with BP measurements and counselling, and the improvement in patient adherence.

摘要

引言

高血压作为心血管疾病的主要危险因素,是医学和公共卫生领域的重要问题。高血压在南亚地区(2010年)被列为疾病归因负担的第三大重要危险因素。高血压给印度的心血管健康状况和医疗系统带来了沉重的公共卫生负担。高血压成年人中未得到控制的高血压与死亡率增加相关。印度关于未得到控制的高血压的数据不足。

目的

本研究旨在评估未得到控制的高血压患者的特征、合并症、管理情况,并确定印度各地难治性高血压患者的数量。

方法

在这项横断面观察性研究中,对4725名正在服用抗高血压药物的未得到控制的高血压患者进行了评估。记录观察到的关于未得到控制的高血压患病率的模式,并评估印度未得到控制的高血压患者的社会人口统计学、病史、人体测量学变量和治疗偏好。

结果

未得到控制的高血压患者中大多数为男性(71.4%),年龄在46 - 65岁之间。大多数研究人群为肥胖前期(男性:35.7%;女性:27.4%)。未得到控制的高血压患者中较高比例是马哈拉施特拉邦(25.6%)和古吉拉特邦(11.6%)的居民。45.4%的患者使用抗高血压单药治疗,54.6%的患者使用联合治疗(≥2类抗高血压药物)。血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARBs)是最常用的单药治疗药物(70.6%),也是双联和三联抗高血压联合药物中最常见的成分。19.5%(922/4725)的患者患有难治性高血压,其中80%的患者年龄在46 - 65岁之间。较高比例的患者为男性(67.2%;620/922),较高比例的患者是安得拉邦(21.4%的患者)和马哈拉施特拉邦(19.3%的患者)的居民。所有922名难治性高血压患者都服用≥3种抗高血压药物,最常用的抗高血压联合治疗方案是ARB + CCB + 利尿剂。糖尿病和血脂异常是未得到控制和难治性高血压患者报告的主要合并症。常用的伴随药物依次为降脂药、口服降糖药和抗血小板药物。未能达到理想血压目标的各种因素可能包括医生对最新高血压治疗指南缺乏认识,这可能导致患者依从性差,原因是没有充分解释药物的益处和风险、没有考虑患者的生活方式、药物成本以及剂量滴定不足。

结论

未得到控制的高血压在印度是一个主要问题。治疗高血压时关注多个危险因素是明智的。多种降压药物的联合治疗很重要,在选择抗高血压治疗联合用药的合适剂量以及确保治疗依从性时应识别相关问题。单药、双联和三联抗高血压治疗方案的首选药物分别是ARBs;ARB + CCB;ARB + CCB + 利尿剂。在本研究中,大多数患者采用单药治疗;然而,为有效管理高血压,需要合理的联合治疗或剂量调整。控制高血压应采取的保护措施包括减少医生的惰性、调整饮食和进行体育活动、定期对患者进行血压测量随访和咨询,以及提高患者的依从性。

相似文献

1
Management Practices in Indian Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension.印度未控制高血压患者的管理实践
J Assoc Physicians India. 2016 Jul;64(7):14-21.
2
DemographIc Assessment and EValuation of DEgree of Lipid Control in High Risk Indian DySlipidemia PatiEnts (DIVERSE Study).印度高危血脂异常患者血脂控制程度的人口统计学评估与评价(DIVERSE研究)
J Assoc Physicians India. 2016 Apr;64(4):38-46.
3
Prescribing patterns in hypertension: the emerging role of fixed-dose combinations for attaining BP goals in hypertensive patients.高血压的处方模式:固定剂量复方制剂在高血压患者实现血压目标方面的新作用。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Aug;24(8):2389-401. doi: 10.1185/03007990802262457. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
4
Prevalence and management of hypertension in primary care in Portugal. Insights from the VALSIM study.葡萄牙初级保健中高血压的患病率及管理。来自VALSIM研究的见解。
Rev Port Cardiol. 2009 May;28(5):499-523.
5
Retrospective analysis of real-world efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers versus other classes of antihypertensive agents in blood pressure management.回顾性分析血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与其他降压药类别在血压管理中的真实世界疗效。
Clin Ther. 2011 Sep;33(9):1190-203. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
6
Management of Hypertension in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Indian Guideline 2024 by Association of Physicians of India and Indian College of Physicians.《印度医师协会和印度内科医师学院 2024 年 2 型糖尿病伴高血压管理印度指南》
J Assoc Physicians India. 2024 Aug;72(8):e1-e25. doi: 10.59556/japi.72.0620.
7
Choice of antihypertensive medications among physicians and its impact on blood pressure control among Nigerians living with hypertension.医生对降压药物的选择及其对尼日利亚高血压患者血压控制的影响。
Niger J Med. 2016 Jul-Sep;25(3):220-5.
8
Medical treatment of hypertension in Switzerland. The 2009 Swiss Hypertension Survey (SWISSHYPE).瑞士的高血压治疗。2009 年瑞士高血压调查(SWISSHYPE)。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2011 Mar 4;141:w13169. doi: 10.4414/smw.2011.13169. eCollection 2011.
9
Rationale, design and patient baseline characteristics of OlmeSartan and calcium antagonists randomized (OSCAR) study: a study comparing the incidence of cardiovascular events between high-dose angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) monotherapy and combination therapy of ARB with calcium channel blocker in Japanese elderly high-risk hypertensive patients (ClinicalTrials. gov no. NCT00134160).奥美沙坦与钙拮抗剂随机对照(OSCAR)研究的原理、设计及患者基线特征:一项比较日本老年高危高血压患者中高剂量血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)单药治疗与ARB联合钙通道阻滞剂治疗心血管事件发生率的研究(ClinicalTrials.gov编号:NCT00134160)
Hypertens Res. 2009 Jul;32(7):575-80. doi: 10.1038/hr.2009.60. Epub 2009 May 15.
10
[On the way to achieve hypertension treatment goals: results of the open observational program AESCULAP (exforge--clinical safety and efficiency of using a double combination of antihypertensive drugs in patients with uncontrolled blood pressure)].在实现高血压治疗目标的道路上:开放观察性项目AESCULAP(安博诺——在血压控制不佳患者中使用双重抗高血压药物组合的临床安全性和有效性)的结果
Ter Arkh. 2013;85(9):35-45.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting factors of blood pressure normalization in hypertensive patients after short-term follow-up.高血压患者短期随访后血压正常化的预测因素
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 27;11:1403214. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1403214. eCollection 2024.
2
Management of Hypertension in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Structured Review.亚太地区高血压管理:系统综述。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2024 Mar;24(2):141-170. doi: 10.1007/s40256-023-00625-1. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
3
Clinical data analysis of telmisartan for hypertension management in Indian population.
替米沙坦用于印度人群高血压管理的临床数据分析
Bioinformation. 2021 Jun 30;17(6):652-659. doi: 10.6026/97320630017652. eCollection 2021.
4
Prevalence and Risk Factors for Resistant Hypertension: Cross-Sectional Study From a Tertiary Care Referral Hospital in South India.顽固性高血压的患病率及危险因素:来自印度南部一家三级医疗转诊医院的横断面研究。
Cureus. 2021 Oct 14;13(10):e18779. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18779. eCollection 2021 Oct.
5
India Hypertension Control Initiative-Hypertension treatment and blood pressure control in a cohort in 24 sentinel site clinics.印度高血压控制倡议-24 个哨点诊所队列中的高血压治疗和血压控制。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2021 Apr;23(4):720-729. doi: 10.1111/jch.14141. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
6
Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension and Its Associated Risk Factors: Results from Baseline Survey of SWADES Family Cohort Study.高血压及其相关危险因素的患病率、知晓率、治疗率和控制率:SWADES家庭队列研究基线调查结果
Int J Hypertens. 2020 Apr 13;2020:4964835. doi: 10.1155/2020/4964835. eCollection 2020.
7
Awareness and practice of aerobic exercise and yoga among hypertensive patients in Anand city.阿南德市高血压患者有氧运动和瑜伽的认知与实践情况
J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Feb 15;8:28. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_146_18. eCollection 2019.