Dong Wei, Olson Elizabeth S
VA Loma Linda Health Care System and Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California.
Otalaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Biophys J. 2016 Oct 18;111(8):1805-1815. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.08.048.
Cochlear frequency tuning is based on a mildly tuned traveling-wave response that is enhanced in amplitude and sharpness by outer hair cell (OHC)-based forces. The nonlinear and active character of this enhancement is the fundamental manifestation of cochlear amplification. Recently, mechanical (pressure) and electrical (extracellular OHC-generated voltage) responses were simultaneously measured close to the sensory tissue's basilar membrane. Both pressure and voltage were tuned and showed traveling-wave phase accumulation, evidence that they were locally generated responses. Approximately at the frequency where nonlinearity commenced, the phase of extracellular voltage shifted up, to lead pressure by >1/4 cycle. Based on established and fundamental relationships among voltage, force, pressure, displacement, and power, the observed phase shift was identified as the activation of cochlear amplification. In this study, the operation of the cochlear amplifier was further explored, via changes in pressure and voltage responses upon delivery of a second, suppressor tone. Two different suppression paradigms were used, one with a low-frequency suppressor and a swept-frequency probe, the other with two swept-frequency tones, either of which can be considered as probe or suppressor. In the presence of a high-level low-frequency suppressor, extracellular voltage responses at probe-tone frequencies were greatly reduced, and the pressure responses were reduced nearly to their linear, passive level. On the other hand, the amplifier-activating phase shift between pressure and voltage responses was still present in probe-tone responses. These findings are consistent with low-frequency suppression being caused by the saturation of OHC electrical responses and not by a change in the power-enabling phasing of the underlying mechanics. In the two-tone swept-frequency suppression paradigm, mild suppression was apparent in the pressure responses, while deep notches could develop in the voltage responses. A simple analysis, based on a two-wave differencing scheme, was used to explore the observations.
耳蜗频率调谐基于一种微调的行波响应,这种响应通过基于外毛细胞(OHC)的力在幅度和锐度上得到增强。这种增强的非线性和主动特性是耳蜗放大的基本表现。最近,在靠近感觉组织的基底膜处同时测量了机械(压力)和电(细胞外OHC产生的电压)响应。压力和电压都被调谐并显示出行波相位积累,这证明它们是局部产生的响应。大约在非线性开始的频率处,细胞外电压的相位向上移动,比压力超前>1/4周期。基于电压、力、压力、位移和功率之间既定的基本关系,观察到的相位偏移被确定为耳蜗放大的激活。在本研究中,通过在施加第二个抑制音时压力和电压响应的变化,进一步探索了耳蜗放大器的运作。使用了两种不同的抑制范式,一种是低频抑制音和扫频探测音,另一种是两个扫频音,其中任何一个都可以被视为探测音或抑制音。在存在高水平低频抑制音的情况下,探测音频率处的细胞外电压响应大大降低,压力响应几乎降低到其线性被动水平。另一方面,压力和电压响应之间的放大器激活相位偏移在探测音响应中仍然存在。这些发现与低频抑制是由OHC电响应的饱和引起的,而不是由潜在力学的功率启用相位变化引起的这一观点一致。在双音扫频抑制范式中,压力响应中明显出现轻度抑制,而电压响应中可能出现深度凹陷。基于两波差分方案的简单分析被用于探索这些观察结果。