Suppr超能文献

重视自身健康状况的多发性硬化症患者:15D量表的评估及心理测量特性

Multiple Sclerosis Patients Valuing Their Own Health Status: Valuation and Psychometric Properties of the 15D.

作者信息

Dagklis Ioannis E, Aletras Vasilis H, Tsantaki Efthymia, Orologas Anastasios, Niakas Dimitrios

机构信息

Faculty of Social Sciences, Hellenic Open University , Patras.

Department of Business Administration, University of Macedonia , Thessaloniki.

出版信息

Neurol Int. 2016 Sep 30;8(3):6416. doi: 10.4081/ni.2016.6416.

Abstract

An ongoing debate on decision and cost-utility analyses is whether to use preferences of general public or patients. The aim of this study was to replicate the valuation procedure of the multi-attribute utility generic measure, 15D, using a sample of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and to assess its psychometric properties. Consecutive outpatient MS patients were recruited from two MS centers in Greece. The three-stage valuation procedure was applied and, with the use of elicited preference weights, an MS patients' algorithm was developed. The original Finnish value set derived from healthy individuals was also used to calculate scores and a comparison between the two algorithms was made. A total of 64 MS patients were evaluated. The 15D scores obtained with the MS patients' valuation algorithm were higher than the original one. The derived utilities differed significantly with respect to age, depressive symptoms, Expanded Disability Status Scale score and clinical form. MS patients indicated as most important domains mobility, mental functioning and vitality. Cronbach's alpha was estimated 0.876 and correlations between relevant dimensions of the instruments were moderate to high. The 15D was generally feasible and reliable in patients with MS and the valuation system yielded acceptable psychometric properties.

摘要

关于决策分析和成本效用分析的一个持续争论是,究竟应该采用普通公众还是患者的偏好。本研究的目的是,使用多发性硬化症(MS)患者样本,复制多属性效用通用测量方法15D的估值程序,并评估其心理测量特性。从希腊的两个MS中心招募连续就诊的门诊MS患者。应用了三阶段估值程序,并利用得出的偏好权重开发了一个MS患者算法。源自健康个体的原始芬兰价值集也被用于计算得分,并对两种算法进行了比较。总共评估了64名MS患者。通过MS患者估值算法获得的15D得分高于原始算法。得出的效用在年龄、抑郁症状、扩展残疾状态量表得分和临床类型方面存在显著差异。MS患者指出,最重要的领域是活动能力、心理功能和活力。克朗巴赫α系数估计为0.876,工具相关维度之间的相关性为中度到高度。15D在MS患者中总体上是可行且可靠的,该估值系统产生了可接受的心理测量特性。

相似文献

2
Valuation and preliminary validation of the Greek 15D in a sample of patients with coronary artery disease.
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):574-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00462.x. Epub 2008 Oct 8.
3
Comparing 15D Valuation Studies in Norway and Finland-Challenges When Combining Information from Several Valuation Tasks.
Value Health. 2018 Apr;21(4):462-470. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
4
A Norwegian 15D value algorithm: proposing a new procedure to estimate 15D value algorithms.
Qual Life Res. 2019 May;28(5):1129-1143. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2043-9. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
6
The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications.
Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):328-36. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002086.
8
Patient and public preferences for health states associated with AMD.
Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Aug;90(8):855-60. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3182962318.

引用本文的文献

2
Evolution of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Their Role in Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Trials.
Neurotherapeutics. 2017 Oct;14(4):934-944. doi: 10.1007/s13311-017-0571-6.

本文引用的文献

2
The CONSORT Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) extension: implications for clinical trials and practice.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Oct 29;11:184. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-184.
3
Do generic utility measures capture what is important to the quality of life of people with multiple sclerosis?
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Apr 25;11:71. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-71.
4
Psychometric and factor analytic evaluation of the 15D health-related quality of life instrument: the case of Greece.
Qual Life Res. 2013 Oct;22(8):1973-86. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0348-2. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
5
Health outcomes in economic evaluation: who should value health?
Br Med Bull. 2011;97:197-210. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldr001. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
6
Quality of life in multiple sclerosis: determinants, measurement, and use in clinical practice.
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2010 Sep;10(5):397-406. doi: 10.1007/s11910-010-0132-4.
9
Valuation and preliminary validation of the Greek 15D in a sample of patients with coronary artery disease.
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):574-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00462.x. Epub 2008 Oct 8.
10
Health state utilities: a framework for studying the gap between the imagined and the real.
Value Health. 2008 Jan-Feb;11(1):76-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00216.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验