Jenke Libby, Huettel Scott A
Department of Political Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Nov;20(11):794-804. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
Voter choice is one of the most important problems in political science. The most common models assume that voting is a rational choice based on policy positions (e.g., key issues) and nonpolicy information (e.g., social identity, personality). Though such models explain macroscopic features of elections, they also reveal important anomalies that have been resistant to explanation. We argue for a new approach that builds upon recent research in cognitive science and neuroscience; specifically, we contend that policy positions and social identities do not combine in merely an additive manner, but compete to determine voter preferences. This model not only explains several key anomalies in voter choice, but also suggests new directions for research in both political science and cognitive science.
选民选择是政治学中最重要的问题之一。最常见的模型假定投票是基于政策立场(如关键议题)和非政策信息(如社会身份、个性)的理性选择。尽管此类模型解释了选举的宏观特征,但它们也揭示了一些难以解释的重要异常现象。我们主张一种基于认知科学和神经科学最新研究成果的新方法;具体而言,我们认为政策立场和社会身份并非仅仅以相加的方式结合,而是相互竞争以决定选民偏好。该模型不仅解释了选民选择中的几个关键异常现象,还为政治学和认知科学的研究提出了新的方向。