Suppr超能文献

议题还是身份认同?选民选择的认知基础

Issues or Identity? Cognitive Foundations of Voter Choice.

作者信息

Jenke Libby, Huettel Scott A

机构信息

Department of Political Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA; Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

出版信息

Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Nov;20(11):794-804. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

Abstract

Voter choice is one of the most important problems in political science. The most common models assume that voting is a rational choice based on policy positions (e.g., key issues) and nonpolicy information (e.g., social identity, personality). Though such models explain macroscopic features of elections, they also reveal important anomalies that have been resistant to explanation. We argue for a new approach that builds upon recent research in cognitive science and neuroscience; specifically, we contend that policy positions and social identities do not combine in merely an additive manner, but compete to determine voter preferences. This model not only explains several key anomalies in voter choice, but also suggests new directions for research in both political science and cognitive science.

摘要

选民选择是政治学中最重要的问题之一。最常见的模型假定投票是基于政策立场(如关键议题)和非政策信息(如社会身份、个性)的理性选择。尽管此类模型解释了选举的宏观特征,但它们也揭示了一些难以解释的重要异常现象。我们主张一种基于认知科学和神经科学最新研究成果的新方法;具体而言,我们认为政策立场和社会身份并非仅仅以相加的方式结合,而是相互竞争以决定选民偏好。该模型不仅解释了选民选择中的几个关键异常现象,还为政治学和认知科学的研究提出了新的方向。

相似文献

1
Issues or Identity? Cognitive Foundations of Voter Choice.议题还是身份认同?选民选择的认知基础
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Nov;20(11):794-804. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
2
Voter Preferences Reflect a Competition Between Policy and Identity.选民偏好反映了政策与身份认同之间的竞争。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 15;11:566020. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566020. eCollection 2020.
6
The unexpected empirical consensus among consensus methods.共识方法之间意外的经验性共识。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):629-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01950.x.
8
Motivating voter turnout by invoking the self.通过唤起自我来激发选民投票率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 2;108(31):12653-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1103343108. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
9
By Design: How People Adapt to Cognitive Limitations in Politics.设计:人们如何适应政治中的认知局限。
Top Cogn Sci. 2024 Apr;16(2):175-186. doi: 10.1111/tops.12690. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
10
The political dynamics of voter retrospection and disaster responses.选民回顾与灾难应对的政治动态。
Disasters. 2020 Apr;44(2):239-261. doi: 10.1111/disa.12376. Epub 2019 Sep 2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
6
7
8
A nexus model of the temporal-parietal junction.颞顶联合区的枢纽模型。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Jul;17(7):328-36. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
10
The ubiquity of model-based reinforcement learning.基于模型的强化学习无处不在。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012 Dec;22(6):1075-81. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2012.08.003. Epub 2012 Sep 6.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验