The Simpson Centre for Health Services Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, The University of New South Wales, P.O. Box 6087 UNSW, Sydney, NSW 1466, Australia.
Intensive Care Unit, Liverpool Hospital, Level 2, Clinical Building, 1 Elizabeth St., Liverpool, NSW 2170, Australia.
Resuscitation. 2016 Dec;109:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.09.031. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
To investigate associations between clinical parameters - beyond the evident physiological deterioration and limitations of medical treatment - with in-hospital death for patients receiving Rapid Response System (RRS) attendances.
Retrospective case-control analysis of clinical parameters for 328 patients aged 60 years and above at their last RRS call during admission to a single teaching hospital in the 2012-2013 calendar years. Generalised estimating equation modelling was used to compare the deceased with a randomly selected sample of those who had RRS calls and survived admission (controls), matched by age group, sex, and hospital ward.
In addition to a pre-existing order for limitation of treatment or cardiac arrest (OR 6.92; 95%CI 4.61-10.27), nursing home residence, proteinuria, advanced malignancy, acute myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease, cognitive impairment and frailty were associated with high risk of death. After adjusting for all the clinical indicators investigated, the strongest risk factors for in-hospital death for patients with a RRS call were advanced malignancy (OR 3.95; 95%CI 2.16-7.21) and new myocardial infarction (OR 2.79; 95%CI 1.86-4.20). Patients with cognitive impairment, frailty indicator or chronic kidney disease were twice as likely to die as patients without those risk factors.
In a sample of older deteriorated patients requiring a RRS attendance, multiple indicators of chronic illness, cognitive impairment and frailty were significantly associated with high risk of death. These clinical features beyond the evident orders for limitation of medical treatment should signal the need for clinicians to initiate end-of-life discussions that may prevent futile interventions.
探讨接受快速反应系统(RRS)就诊的患者,除了明显的生理恶化和医疗治疗限制之外,临床参数与住院内死亡之间的关联。
对 2012-2013 年在一家教学医院住院期间最后一次 RRS 呼叫时年龄在 60 岁及以上的 328 例患者的临床参数进行回顾性病例对照分析。使用广义估计方程模型比较死亡患者与 RRS 呼叫且存活入院的随机选择样本(对照),按年龄组、性别和医院病房进行匹配。
除了预先存在的治疗限制或心脏骤停医嘱(OR 6.92;95%CI 4.61-10.27)外,疗养院居住、蛋白尿、晚期恶性肿瘤、急性心肌梗死、慢性肾脏病、认知障碍和虚弱与高死亡风险相关。在调整了所有调查的临床指标后,RRS 呼叫患者住院内死亡的最强危险因素是晚期恶性肿瘤(OR 3.95;95%CI 2.16-7.21)和新发心肌梗死(OR 2.79;95%CI 1.86-4.20)。有认知障碍、虚弱指标或慢性肾脏病的患者死亡的可能性是没有这些危险因素的患者的两倍。
在需要接受 RRS 就诊的老年恶化患者样本中,多种慢性疾病、认知障碍和虚弱的指标与高死亡风险显著相关。这些临床特征超出了医疗治疗限制的明显医嘱,应提示临床医生启动可能预防无效干预的临终讨论。