• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院获得性肺炎的治疗:单一疗法与联合疗法

Treatment of nosocomial pneumonia: monotherapy versus combination therapy.

作者信息

Greco T

机构信息

Section of Inflammatory Diseases, Saint Mary's Hospital, Waterbury, Connecticut.

出版信息

Geriatrics. 1989 Aug;44 Suppl A:28-31.

PMID:2777095
Abstract

Pneumonia accounts for 15% of all nosocomial infections, and mortality case rates are as high as 60%. Aspiration of oropharyngeal flora is the most common antecedent to nosocomial pneumonia. Patients with chronic lung disease, depressed levels of consciousness, or who are intubated are at increased risk of developing pneumonia. We conducted two comparative, prospective studies using monotherapy with third-generation cephalosporins--the first comparing cefoperazone with combination therapy, and the second comparing cefoperazone monotherapy with ceftazidime monotherapy--for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in mildly to moderately ill patients. We found that both cefoperazone monotherapy and ceftazidime monotherapy were as effective as standard two-drug combinations (clindamycin/gentamicin or cefazolin/gentamicin). When total antibiotic costs were compared, cefoperazone monotherapy was the least expensive regimen.

摘要

肺炎占所有医院感染的15%,死亡率高达60%。口咽菌群吸入是医院获得性肺炎最常见的诱因。患有慢性肺部疾病、意识水平低下或接受插管的患者发生肺炎的风险增加。我们进行了两项比较性前瞻性研究,使用第三代头孢菌素单药治疗——第一项比较头孢哌酮与联合治疗,第二项比较头孢哌酮单药治疗与头孢他啶单药治疗——用于治疗轻至中度疾病患者的医院获得性肺炎。我们发现,头孢哌酮单药治疗和头孢他啶单药治疗与标准两药联合治疗(克林霉素/庆大霉素或头孢唑林/庆大霉素)一样有效。在比较总抗生素成本时,头孢哌酮单药治疗是最便宜的治疗方案。

相似文献

1
Treatment of nosocomial pneumonia: monotherapy versus combination therapy.医院获得性肺炎的治疗:单一疗法与联合疗法
Geriatrics. 1989 Aug;44 Suppl A:28-31.
2
Cefoperazone versus combination antibiotic therapy of hospital-acquired pneumonia.头孢哌酮与联合抗生素治疗医院获得性肺炎的对比
Am J Med. 1988 Jan;84(1):68-74. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90010-1.
3
Empiric monotherapy versus combination therapy of nosocomial pneumonia in trauma patients.创伤患者医院获得性肺炎的经验性单药治疗与联合治疗
J Trauma. 1993 Aug;35(2):303-9; discussion 309-11. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199308000-00022.
4
[Evaluation of the effectiveness of ceftazidime in treatment of nosocomial infections in children].[头孢他啶治疗儿童医院感染的疗效评估]
Pediatr Pol. 1996 Jul;71(7):605-7.
5
Monotherapy is appropriate for nosocomial pneumonia in the intensive care unit.
Semin Respir Infect. 1993 Dec;8(4):259-67.
6
Pharmacoeconomic comparison of sequential IV/oral ciprofloxacin versus ceftazidime in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia.序贯静脉注射/口服环丙沙星与头孢他啶治疗医院获得性肺炎的药物经济学比较
Can J Hosp Pharm. 1995 Oct;48(5):276-83.
7
Combined aztreonam and gentamicin therapy for pseudomonal lower respiratory tract infections.
Clin Ther. 1994 Mar-Apr;16(2):236-52.
8
Cefoperazone versus ceftazidime monotherapy of nosocomial pneumonia.头孢哌酮与头孢他啶单药治疗医院获得性肺炎的比较
Am J Med. 1988 Jul 25;85(1A):44-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(88)90174-x.
9
Monotherapy of gram-negative nosocomial pneumonia.革兰阴性菌医院获得性肺炎的单药治疗。
J Tenn Med Assoc. 1993 Aug;86(8):353-4.
10
[Prospective randomized controlled study of a ceftazidime and pefloxacin combination versus a ceftazidime and amikacin combination in the empirical treatment of pneumonia and nosocomial septicemia at intensive care units].头孢他啶与培氟沙星联合用药对比头孢他啶与阿米卡星联合用药在重症监护病房肺炎和医院感染败血症经验性治疗中的前瞻性随机对照研究
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1989 May;37(5):496-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Beta lactam antibiotic monotherapy versus beta lactam-aminoglycoside antibiotic combination therapy for sepsis.β-内酰胺类抗生素单药治疗与β-内酰胺类-氨基糖苷类抗生素联合治疗败血症的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 7;2014(1):CD003344. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003344.pub3.