• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢他啶与培氟沙星联合用药对比头孢他啶与阿米卡星联合用药在重症监护病房肺炎和医院感染败血症经验性治疗中的前瞻性随机对照研究

[Prospective randomized controlled study of a ceftazidime and pefloxacin combination versus a ceftazidime and amikacin combination in the empirical treatment of pneumonia and nosocomial septicemia at intensive care units].

作者信息

Beuscart C, Leroy O, Mouton Y, Pappo M, Drugeon H

机构信息

Service Régional des Maladies Infectieuses, Centre Hospitalier de Tourcoing.

出版信息

Pathol Biol (Paris). 1989 May;37(5):496-9.

PMID:2674875
Abstract

Three hundred fifty-two patients from 20 intensive care units, suffering from pneumonia or nosocomial septicemia were treated at random with either ceftazidime + pefloxacin (CP) or ceftazidime + amikacin (CA). After exclusion of patients who did not comply with the protocol and of cases where no organism was isolated, 108 assessable patients received CP and 114 received CA. The cure rates achieved in infections due to a single organism were 82 per cent in the CA group and 62 per cent in the CP group. In infections due to multiple organisms, the cure rate was 67 per cent with both antibiotic regimens.

摘要

来自20个重症监护病房的352例患有肺炎或医院败血症的患者被随机分为两组,分别接受头孢他啶+培氟沙星(CP)或头孢他啶+阿米卡星(CA)治疗。在排除不符合方案的患者以及未分离出病原体的病例后,108例可评估患者接受了CP治疗,114例接受了CA治疗。单种病原体感染的治愈率在CA组为82%,在CP组为62%。在多种病原体感染中,两种抗生素治疗方案的治愈率均为67%。

相似文献

1
[Prospective randomized controlled study of a ceftazidime and pefloxacin combination versus a ceftazidime and amikacin combination in the empirical treatment of pneumonia and nosocomial septicemia at intensive care units].头孢他啶与培氟沙星联合用药对比头孢他啶与阿米卡星联合用药在重症监护病房肺炎和医院感染败血症经验性治疗中的前瞻性随机对照研究
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1989 May;37(5):496-9.
2
[Controlled randomized prospective study of a ceftazidime-pefloxacin combination versus a ceftazidime-amikacin combination in the empirical treatment of nosocomial pneumonias and septicemias of resuscitation. Preliminary results].头孢他啶-培氟沙星联合用药与头孢他啶-阿米卡星联合用药在复苏后医院获得性肺炎和败血症经验性治疗中的对照随机前瞻性研究。初步结果
Presse Med. 1988 Oct 26;17(37):1928-32.
3
The efficacy and safety of isepamicin and ceftazidime compared with amikacin and ceftazidime in acute lower respiratory tract infection.异帕米星与头孢他啶联用对比阿米卡星与头孢他啶联用在急性下呼吸道感染中的疗效及安全性
J Chemother. 1995 Jun;7 Suppl 2:129-35.
4
Efficacy and tolerability of piperacillin/tazobactam versus ceftazidime in association with amikacin for treating nosocomial pneumonia in intensive care patients: a prospective randomized multicenter trial.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与头孢他啶联合阿米卡星治疗重症监护患者医院获得性肺炎的疗效和耐受性:一项前瞻性随机多中心试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Mar;27(3):493-502. doi: 10.1007/s001340000846.
5
Ceftazidime versus a combination of amikacin and ticarcillin in the treatment of severe infections.头孢他啶与阿米卡星联合替卡西林治疗严重感染的对比研究
Clin Ther. 1988;10(5):589-93.
6
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of isepamicin compared with amikacin in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia and septicaemia.异帕米星与阿米卡星治疗医院获得性肺炎和败血症的疗效及安全性评估。
J Chemother. 1995 Jun;7 Suppl 2:165-73.
7
Treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic leukemic patients with the antibiotic combinations piperacillin or ceftazidime plus amikacin: results of a randomized study.用哌拉西林或头孢他啶联合阿米卡星抗生素组合治疗中性粒细胞减少的白血病患者发热性发作:一项随机研究的结果
Chemioterapia. 1988 Oct;7(5):323-6.
8
Intravenous ciprofloxacin versus ceftazidime for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia and urinary tract infection.静脉注射环丙沙星与头孢他啶治疗医院获得性肺炎和尿路感染的比较。
Clin Pharm. 1991 Jan;10(1):49-55.
9
Efficacy of the combination of levofloxacin plus ceftazidime in the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia in the intensive care unit.左氧氟沙星联合头孢他啶治疗重症监护病房医院获得性肺炎的疗效
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2006 Dec;28(6):582-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2006.08.006. Epub 2006 Sep 18.
10
[Imipenem/cilastatin versus ceftazidime-amikacin in the treatment of febrile neutropenic patients].亚胺培南/西司他丁与头孢他啶-阿米卡星治疗发热性中性粒细胞减少患者的对比研究
Rev Med Chil. 1995 Mar;123(3):312-20.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia in the UK: report of the working party on hospital-acquired pneumonia of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.英国医院获得性肺炎管理指南:英国抗菌化疗协会医院获得性肺炎工作组报告
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 Jul;62(1):5-34. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn162. Epub 2008 Apr 29.