Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA; Center for Geospatial Analytics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA; Center for Human Health and the Environment, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
8 80 Cities, Toronto, ONT, Canada.
Prev Med. 2017 Oct;103S:S15-S20. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.10.014. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
Popularity of Open Streets, temporarily opening streets to communities and closing streets to vehicles, in the US has recently surged. As of January 2016, 122 cities have hosted an Open Streets program. Even with this great expansion, the sustainability of Open Streets remains a challenge in many cities and overall Open Streets in the US differ from their successful counterparts in Central and South America. Between summer 2015 and winter 2016, we reviewed the websites and social media of the 122 identified programs and interviewed 32 unique Open Streets programs. Websites and social media were reviewed for program initiation, number of Open Streets days, length of routes, duration of program, and reported participation. Interview questions focused on barriers and facilitators of expanding Open Streets and specific questioning regarding local evaluation activities. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed with constant comparative methodology. Over three-quarters of US Open Streets programs have been initiated since 2010, with median frequency of one time per year, 4h per date, and 5000-9999 participants. Seventy-seven percent of program routes are under 5km in length. Success of programs was measured by enthusiasm, attendance, social media, survey metrics, and sustainability. Thirteen of 32 program organizers expressed interest in expanding their programs to 12 dates per year, but noted consistent barriers to expansion including funding, permitting, and branding. Though many cities now host Open Streets programs, their ability to effect public health remains limited with few program dates per year. Coordinated efforts, especially around funding, permitting, and branding may assist in expanding program dates.
美国的“开放街道”(即暂时开放街道供社区使用并关闭街道供车辆使用)活动最近越来越受欢迎。截至 2016 年 1 月,已有 122 个城市举办了“开放街道”活动。尽管有了这样的巨大扩展,许多城市的“开放街道”可持续性仍然是一个挑战,而且美国的“开放街道”与中美洲和南美洲的成功案例有所不同。在 2015 年夏季至 2016 年冬季期间,我们审查了 122 个已确定的项目的网站和社交媒体,并对 32 个独特的“开放街道”项目进行了采访。我们审查了网站和社交媒体上的项目启动情况、“开放街道”天数、路线长度、项目持续时间和报告的参与情况。访谈问题侧重于扩大“开放街道”的障碍和促进因素,以及针对当地评估活动的具体问题。所有访谈均逐字记录,并采用恒定性比较方法进行分析。超过四分之三的美国“开放街道”项目是在 2010 年之后启动的,每年举办一次的项目中位数频率为 4 小时/次,每次活动的参与者人数为 5000-9999 人。77%的项目路线长度不到 5 公里。项目的成功标准是热情度、参与度、社交媒体、调查指标和可持续性。32 个项目组织者中有 13 个表示有兴趣将其项目扩展到每年 12 次,但他们指出,扩大项目的持续障碍包括资金、许可和品牌推广。尽管许多城市现在都举办了“开放街道”项目,但由于每年的项目日期较少,它们对公共健康的影响仍然有限。协调一致的努力,特别是在资金、许可和品牌推广方面的努力,可能有助于扩大项目日期。