Robertson John A
Vinson & Elkins Chair in Law, University of Texas School of Law, 727 East Dean Keeton Street, Austin, TX 78703.
J Law Biosci. 2014 Mar 28;1(2):113-136. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsu002. eCollection 2014 Jun.
With the development of rapid freezing of human oocytes, many programs have reported IVF success rates comparable to those achieved with fresh eggs and thawed frozen embryos. Egg freezing is now gaining professional and regulatory acceptance as a safe and effective technique for women who wish to avoid discarding excess embryos, who face fertility-threatening medical treatments, or who want to preserve their eggs for use when they are better situated to have a family. This article focuses on the uses of and justification for egg freezing, the path to professional acceptance, the variability in success rates, and the controversy over freezing eggs for social rather than medical reasons. It also addresses the emergence of egg banking as a separate sector in the infertility industry, the regulatory issues that it poses, and its effect on egg donation. Key here is the legal control of stored eggs by banking women and their options when they wish to dispose of those eggs. The analysis is framed around empowerment and alienation. Egg freezing is generally empowering for women, but the donation or sale of unused eggs to infertile women, egg bankers, and researchers also raises issues of alienation.
随着人类卵母细胞快速冷冻技术的发展,许多项目报告称体外受精成功率与使用新鲜卵子和冷冻解冻胚胎所取得的成功率相当。卵子冷冻作为一种安全有效的技术,目前正获得专业人士和监管机构的认可,适用于那些希望避免丢弃多余胚胎、面临威胁生育的医学治疗或希望在更适合组建家庭时保存卵子以供使用的女性。本文重点关注卵子冷冻的用途和合理性、获得专业认可的途径、成功率的差异以及出于社会而非医学原因冷冻卵子的争议。它还讨论了卵子库作为不孕不育行业中一个独立领域的出现、其所带来的监管问题及其对卵子捐赠的影响。这里的关键是卵子库女性对所储存卵子的法律控制权以及她们在希望处置这些卵子时的选择。分析围绕赋权和异化展开。卵子冷冻总体上赋予女性权力,但将未使用的卵子捐赠或出售给不孕女性、卵子库和研究人员也引发了异化问题。