Molho Eric S, Stacy Mark, Gillard Patrick, Charles David, Adler Charles H, Jankovic Joseph, Schwartz Marc, Brin Mitchell F
Albany Medical Center Albany New York USA.
Duke University Medical Center Durham North Carolina USA.
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2016 Mar-Apr;3(2):130-138. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12238. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
Cervical dystonia is thought to result in high disease burden, but limited information exists on its impact on employment and work productivity. We utilized data from the Cervical Dystonia Patient Registry for the Observation of OnabotulinumtoxinA Efficacy (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00836017) to assess the impact of cervical dystonia on employment and work productivity and examine the effect of onabotulinumtoxinA treatments on work productivity.
Subjects completed a questionnaire on employment status and work productivity at baseline and final visit. Baseline data were examined by severity of cervical dystonia, predominant subtype, presence of pain, prior exposure to botulinum toxin, and/or utility of a sensory trick. Work productivity results at baseline and final visit were compared in subjects who were toxin-naïve at baseline and received three onabotulinumtoxinA treatments.
Of 1,038 subjects, 42.8% were employed full- or part-time, 6.1% unemployed, 32.7% retired, and 11.8% disabled. Of those currently employed, cervical dystonia affected work status of 26.0%, caused 29.8% to miss work in the past month (mean, 5.1 ± 6.4 days), and 57.8% reported decreased productivity. Half of those unemployed were employed when symptoms began, and 38.5% attributed lost employment to cervical dystonia. Pain, increasing severity, and anterocollis/retrocollis had the largest effects on work status/productivity. Preliminary analyses showed that absenteeism and presenteeism were significantly decreased following onabotulinumtoxinA treatments in the subpopulation that was toxin-naïve at baseline.
This analysis confirms the substantial negative impact of cervical dystonia on employment, with cervical dystonia-associated pain being a particularly important driver. OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment appears to improve work productivity.
人们认为颈部肌张力障碍会导致较高的疾病负担,但关于其对就业和工作生产力影响的信息有限。我们利用颈部肌张力障碍患者登记处观察A型肉毒毒素疗效的数据(临床试验.gov标识符:NCT00836017)来评估颈部肌张力障碍对就业和工作生产力的影响,并研究A型肉毒毒素治疗对工作生产力的影响。
受试者在基线和末次访视时完成一份关于就业状况和工作生产力的问卷。通过颈部肌张力障碍的严重程度、主要亚型、疼痛的存在、先前接触肉毒毒素的情况和/或感觉技巧的效用对基线数据进行检查。对基线时未接触毒素且接受三次A型肉毒毒素治疗的受试者在基线和末次访视时的工作生产力结果进行比较。
在1038名受试者中,42.8%为全职或兼职就业,6.1%失业,32.7%退休,11.8%残疾。在目前就业的人群中,颈部肌张力障碍影响了26.0%的工作状态,导致29.8%的人在过去一个月内缺勤(平均5.1±6.4天),57.8%的人报告生产力下降。一半的失业者在症状开始时是就业的,38.5%将失业归因于颈部肌张力障碍。疼痛、严重程度增加以及前斜颈/后斜颈对工作状态/生产力的影响最大。初步分析表明,在基线时未接触毒素的亚组中,A型肉毒毒素治疗后缺勤率和出勤时生产力下降情况显著降低。
该分析证实了颈部肌张力障碍对就业有重大负面影响,与颈部肌张力障碍相关的疼痛是一个特别重要的驱动因素。A型肉毒毒素治疗似乎能提高工作生产力。