Banyard Victoria L, Rizzo Andrew, Edwards Katie M
Rutgers University.
University of New Hampshire.
Psychol Violence. 2020 Sep;10(5):531-541. doi: 10.1037/vio0000281. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
Researchers and practitioners are becoming increasingly aware that domestic and sexual violence (DSV) can be addressed at the community level by involving bystanders (or , a term used to specify third parties who help as opposed to those who stand by). Since most research on DSV actionists has been conducted in secondary and higher educational contexts, little is known about actionist behaviors in towns and neighborhoods among adults. The current study examines how groups of actionists with differing levels of proactive and reactive behaviors related to DSV prevention vary in their community perceptions.
We surveyed 1,623 adults (age range = 18 and over; 95% White; 52% female) across four rural communities in New England using direct mail methods. We asked participants about their perceived opportunities for taking action in the face of acute DSV risk and about any such actions they had taken in their communities during the past year. We also asked about participants' perceptions of community prevention-related social norms. From this data, we calculated prevention action ratios that resulted in three groups of actionists: non-responders, occasional responders, and frequent responders.
Individuals who more consistently responded to DSV reported positive perceptions of community social norms and processes. The most involved group of actionists had stronger perceptions of injunctive community norms.
Results suggest that prevention strategies that aim to change social norms among adults may enhance prevention outcomes in communities.
研究人员和从业者越来越意识到,通过让旁观者(或“行动者”,这一术语用于指定提供帮助的第三方,而非袖手旁观的人)参与进来,可以在社区层面解决家庭暴力和性暴力(DSV)问题。由于大多数关于DSV行动者的研究是在中等教育和高等教育背景下进行的,对于城镇和社区中成年人的行动者行为知之甚少。当前的研究考察了与DSV预防相关的主动和被动行为水平不同的行动者群体在社区认知方面是如何变化的。
我们使用直邮方法对新英格兰四个农村社区的1623名成年人(年龄范围 = 18岁及以上;95%为白人;52%为女性)进行了调查。我们询问参与者在面对严重DSV风险时他们认为采取行动的机会,以及他们在过去一年中在自己社区采取的任何此类行动。我们还询问了参与者对社区预防相关社会规范的看法。根据这些数据,我们计算了预防行动比率,并由此得出了三组行动者:无回应者、偶尔回应者和频繁回应者。
对DSV回应更为一致的个体对社区社会规范和流程有积极的认知。参与度最高的行动者群体对指令性社区规范有更强的认知。
结果表明,旨在改变成年人社会规范的预防策略可能会提高社区的预防效果。