Ismail Mariam R, Seabrook Jamie A, Gilliland Jason A
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, Brescia University College, Department of Paediatrics, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Human Environments Analysis Laboratory, Western University, Children's Health Research Institute, Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Dec 7;21:101281. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101281. eCollection 2021 Mar.
Despite the importance of process evaluation in program evaluations, research has focused primarily on the effectiveness of fruit and vegetables (FVs) distribution interventions on children's consumption, with little attention given to how these interventions achieve their outcomes. Five bibliographic databases (Embase, PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection) were searched in June 2019 for studies of interventions where the main focus was the implementation of distributed FVs to school-aged children as a snack. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool was used to appraise the risk of bias within included studies. Data were extracted based on study characteristics and findings. Results identified 24 studies reporting on 11 interventions and 1 policy. The findings of this systematic review indicate that the majority of the studies included limited references to implementation research. Recurring limitations include an absence of an evaluation theoretical framework and the data collection methods used. Also, several factors were identified as informing the success of snack-based FVs distribution programs, including participation of the school community, school characteristics, background knowledge, and parental engagement. Lack of timely FVs delivery, limited funding, inadequate awareness about the program, insufficient teachers' time, and food waste were identified as challenges to successful programming. Findings indicate that distributing FVs to school-aged children as a snack can increase their consumption, but only with proper implementation. Further evaluative research is required to better inform future implementation of snack-based FV distribution interventions in school settings.
尽管过程评估在项目评估中很重要,但研究主要集中在水果和蔬菜(FV)分发干预措施对儿童消费的有效性上,很少关注这些干预措施是如何实现其成果的。2019年6月,对五个文献数据库(Embase、PubMed、ProQuest、Scopus和科学网核心合集)进行了检索,以查找主要关注向学龄儿童分发FV作为零食的干预措施的研究。使用批判性评估技能计划(CASP)工具评估纳入研究中的偏倚风险。根据研究特征和结果提取数据。结果确定了24项报告11项干预措施和1项政策的研究。这项系统评价的结果表明,大多数研究对实施研究的提及有限。反复出现的局限性包括缺乏评估理论框架和所使用的数据收集方法。此外,确定了几个影响基于零食的FV分发计划成功的因素,包括学校社区的参与、学校特征、背景知识和家长参与。FV交付不及时、资金有限、对该计划的认识不足、教师时间不足和食物浪费被确定为成功实施计划的挑战。研究结果表明,将FV作为零食分发给学龄儿童可以增加他们的消费量,但前提是要妥善实施。需要进一步的评估研究,以便为未来在学校环境中实施基于零食的FV分发干预措施提供更好的信息。