Herrera C R Campos, Beltramini G C, Avelar W M, Lima F O, Li L M
Departamento de Neurologia, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Complexo Hospitalar Prefeito Edivaldo Orsi "Ouro Verde", Campinas, SP, Brasil.
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016 Oct 24;49(11):e5437. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20165437.
Differently from previous studies that used Transcranial Doppler (TCD) and functional MRI (fMRI) for cerebral vasomotor reactivity (CVR) assessment in patients with carotid stenosis (CS), we assessed CVR using an identical stimulus, the Breath-Holding Test (BHT). We included 15 patients with CS and 7 age-matched controls to verify whether fMRI responded differently to BHT between groups and to calculate the agreement rate between tests. For TCD, impaired CVR was defined when the mean percentage increase on middle cerebral artery velocities was ≤31% on 3 consecutive 30-s apnea intercalated by 4-min normal breathing intervals. For fMRI, the percent variation on blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal intensity in the lentiform nucleus (LN) ipsilateral to the CS (or both LNs for controls) from baseline breathing to apnea was measured. The Euclidian differences between the series of each subject and the series of controls and patients classified it into normal or impaired CVR. We found different percent variations on BOLD-signal intensities between groups (P=0.032). The agreement was good in Controls (85.7%; κ=0.69) and overall (77.3%; κ=0.54). We conclude that BHT was feasible for CVR assessment on fMRI and elicited different BOLD responses in patients and controls, with a good overall agreement between the tests.
与先前使用经颅多普勒(TCD)和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)评估颈动脉狭窄(CS)患者脑血管舒缩反应性(CVR)的研究不同,我们使用相同的刺激——屏气试验(BHT)来评估CVR。我们纳入了15例CS患者和7例年龄匹配的对照,以验证fMRI对BHT的反应在两组之间是否存在差异,并计算测试之间的一致性率。对于TCD,当中脑动脉速度的平均百分比增加值在连续3次30秒屏气(中间间隔4分钟正常呼吸)时≤31%,则定义为CVR受损。对于fMRI,测量从基线呼吸到屏气期间,CS同侧豆状核(LN)(对照组为双侧LN)血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号强度的百分比变化。将每个受试者的系列与对照组和患者的系列之间的欧几里得差异分类为正常或受损的CVR。我们发现两组之间BOLD信号强度的百分比变化不同(P=0.032)。在对照组中一致性良好(85.7%;κ=0.69),总体上一致性也良好(77.3%;κ=0.54)。我们得出结论,BHT对于在fMRI上评估CVR是可行的,并且在患者和对照组中引发了不同的BOLD反应,测试之间总体一致性良好。