Choi Mun Hee, Lee Sung Eun, Choi Jun Young, Lee Seong-Joon, Kim Da Sol, Chae Minjung Kathy, Park Eun Jung, Hong Ji Man
Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Ajou University, 164 World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si 16499, Korea.
Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Ajou University, 164 World cup-ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si 16499, Korea.
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 30;10(15):3386. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153386.
Early and precise neurological prognostication without self-fulfilling prophecy is challenging in post-cardiac arrest syndrome (PCAS), particularly during the targeted temperature management (TTM) period. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of vasomotor reactivity (VMR) using transcranial Doppler (TCD) to determine whether final outcomes of patients with comatose PCAS are predicted. This study included patients who had out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in a tertiary referral hospital over 4 years. The eligible criteria included age ≥18 years, successful return of spontaneous circulation, TTM application, and bedside TCD examination within 72 h. Baseline demographics and multimodal prognostic parameters, including imaging findings, electrophysiological studies, and TCD-VMR parameters, were assessed. The final outcome parameter was cerebral performance category scale (CPC) at 1 month. Potential determinants were compared between good (CPC 1-2) and poor (CPC 3-5) outcome groups. The good outcome group ( = 41) (vs. poor ( = 117)) showed a higher VMR value (54.4% ± 33.0% vs. 25.1% ± 35.8%, < 0.001). The addition of VMR to conventional prognostic parameters significantly improved the prediction power of good outcomes. This study suggests that TCD-VMR is a useful tool at the bedside to evaluate outcomes of patients with comatose PCAS during the TTM.
在心脏骤停后综合征(PCAS)中,尤其是在目标温度管理(TTM)期间,在不出现自我实现预言的情况下进行早期精确的神经学预后评估具有挑战性。本研究旨在探讨使用经颅多普勒(TCD)评估血管运动反应性(VMR)以预测昏迷型PCAS患者最终结局的可行性。本研究纳入了一家三级转诊医院4年期间院外心脏骤停的患者。入选标准包括年龄≥18岁、自主循环成功恢复、应用TTM以及在72小时内进行床边TCD检查。评估了基线人口统计学和多模式预后参数,包括影像学检查结果、电生理研究和TCD-VMR参数。最终结局参数为1个月时的脑功能分类量表(CPC)。比较了良好结局组(CPC 1-2)和不良结局组(CPC 3-5)之间的潜在决定因素。良好结局组(n = 41)(与不良结局组(n = 117)相比)显示出更高的VMR值(54.4%±33.0%对25.1%±35.8%,P < 0.001)。将VMR添加到传统预后参数中可显著提高对良好结局的预测能力。本研究表明,TCD-VMR是在TTM期间床边评估昏迷型PCAS患者结局的有用工具。