Limthongkul S
J Med Assoc Thai. 1989 Jun;72(6):338-45.
The adequacy of emergency room assessment and treatment of patients with acute severe asthmatic attacks was evaluated by analyzing the course of 451 visits of 348 patients to Chulalongkorn hospital's Emergency Room. Eighty-five per cent of the patients had an initial index score of greater than or equal to 4 and an average peak expiratory flow rate of 92.16 +/- 46.3 L/min. The discharge index score was 85 per cent with a score of less than or equal to 3 and an average peak expiratory flow rate of 192 +/- 40.3 L/min. Our study indicated that the predictive index proposed by Fischl et al correlated with the severity of airway obstruction; however, the initial index did not help with emergency room decision-making in predicting which patients might be hospitalized, have a relapse or be discharged. In fact, in our emergency room department, the index score to determine airway obstruction and the pattern of response to treatment were better predictors of the outcome, which was classified into three categories: non-responsive or minimally responsive, responsive, and partially responsive. By using conventional clinical criteria (i.e. recumbent position with elimination of laboured breathing, disappearance of dyspnea and reduction of wheezing), there was a 93 per cent accurate determination in the episodes of patients who responded sufficiently to the emergency room treatment to allow their discharge. The remaining 7 per cent of those seeking emergency treatment were hospitalized, which is a lower incidence than that of others series.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
通过分析348例患者在朱拉隆功医院急诊室的451次就诊过程,评估了急诊室对急性重症哮喘发作患者的评估和治疗是否充分。85%的患者初始指标评分大于或等于4,平均呼气峰值流速为92.16±46.3升/分钟。出院指标评分中,85%的患者评分小于或等于3,平均呼气峰值流速为192±40.3升/分钟。我们的研究表明,Fischl等人提出的预测指标与气道阻塞的严重程度相关;然而,初始指标无助于急诊室判断哪些患者可能住院、复发或出院。事实上,在我们的急诊室,用于确定气道阻塞的指标评分和对治疗的反应模式是预后的更好预测指标,预后分为三类:无反应或反应极小、有反应和部分有反应。采用传统临床标准(即卧位且呼吸困难消失、喘息减轻),对急诊治疗反应良好可出院的患者发作情况判断准确率达93%。其余7%寻求急诊治疗的患者住院,这一发生率低于其他系列。(摘要截选于250字)