Baab D A, Johnson R H
Department of Periodontics, University of Washington, Seattle.
J Periodontol. 1989 Jun;60(6):336-41. doi: 10.1902/jop.1989.60.6.336.
This study tested the effectiveness of a rechargeable electric toothbrush, Interplak, in removing supragingival plaque and resolving gingivitis. Forty adults with gingivitis were randomly assigned to either a "manual" or "electric" group. Detailed oral hygiene instructions were given and a blind examiner assessed plaque scores before and after brushing, toothbrush abrasion, and gingival inflammation at baseline, 1, 2, and 4 weeks. Subjects using the electric brush had significantly lower (P less than 0.05) mean plaque and gingival inflammation scores. The electric group's plaque scores fell from 77% at baseline to 28% (before brushing) and 14% (after brushing) at 4 weeks; the manual group's dropped from 75% to 50% and 30% (before and after brushing, respectively). The mean G.I. for the electric group fell from 1.65 at baseline to 1.28 at 4 weeks, while the manual group's scores decreased from 1.65 to 1.43. The results suggest that the electric brush removed supragingival plaque and resolved gingivitis better than the manual brush over a 28-day period. However, a telephone survey conducted 6 months later indicated that most subjects were not using the device twice a day as they had during the study.
本研究测试了一款可充电电动牙刷Interplak在去除龈上菌斑和缓解牙龈炎方面的效果。40名患有牙龈炎的成年人被随机分为“手动”组或“电动”组。给予了详细的口腔卫生指导,一名盲法检查者在基线、第1、2和4周时评估刷牙前后的菌斑评分、牙刷磨损情况以及牙龈炎症。使用电动牙刷的受试者的平均菌斑和牙龈炎症评分显著更低(P小于0.05)。电动组的菌斑评分从基线时的77%降至4周时刷牙前的28%和刷牙后的14%;手动组的菌斑评分分别从75%降至50%和30%(刷牙前和刷牙后)。电动组的平均牙龈指数从基线时的1.65降至4周时的1.28,而手动组的评分从1.65降至1.43。结果表明,在28天的时间里,电动牙刷在去除龈上菌斑和缓解牙龈炎方面比手动牙刷效果更好。然而,6个月后进行的一项电话调查显示,大多数受试者并未像在研究期间那样每天使用该设备两次。