Moss B F, Magaro P A
Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Ohio.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Sep;57(3):532-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.57.3.532.
The Multivariate Personality Inventory (MPI; Magaro & Smith, 1981), the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility (HGSHS; Shor & Orne, 1962), and the Inventory of Self-Hypnosis (ISH; Shor, 1970) were used to investigate the relationship between personality style and hypnotic procedure in the determination of hypnotic susceptibility. On the basis of MPI scores, a normal college population was segregated into 5 personality styles: hysteric, manic, depressive, character disorder, and compulsive. The hysteric personality was found significantly more hypnotizable than the other personality types in the HGSHS induction context, whereas the compulsive personality was found significantly more hypnotizable in the ISH induction context. Results are discussed in terms of personality and situational factors in relation to previous hypnotic susceptibility research.
多元人格量表（MPI；马加罗和史密斯，1981年）、哈佛群体催眠易感性量表（HGSHS；肖尔和奥恩，1962年）以及自我催眠量表（ISH；肖尔，1970年）被用于研究在催眠易感性测定中人格风格与催眠程序之间的关系。根据MPI得分，将一个正常的大学生群体分为5种人格风格：癔症型、躁狂型、抑郁型、人格障碍型和强迫型。发现在HGSHS诱导情境中，癔症型人格比其他人格类型更容易被催眠，而在ISH诱导情境中，强迫型人格被发现更容易被催眠。结合先前的催眠易感性研究，从人格和情境因素方面对结果进行了讨论。
