Pekala R J, Forbes E J
Psychology Service, Coatesville VA Medical Center, PA 19320, USA.
Am J Clin Hypn. 1997 Jan;39(3):212-24. doi: 10.1080/00029157.1997.10403386.
Subjects were 194 nursing students who experienced the HGSHS A (Shor & Orne, 1962) in which was embedded a 2-minute sitting quietly interval subsequent to the eye catalepsy item, but prior to the "counting out" sequence. After the HGSHS:A, subjects completed the Phenomenology of Consciousness Inventory (PCI) (Pekala, 1982, 1991c) in reference to the sitting quietly interval embedded in the hypnotic induction ceremony. Subjects were divided into low and high susceptible groups. K-means cluster analysis of the subjects' responses to the PCI revealed nine different cluster groups. These groups had different patterns of phenomenological experiences that cut across individual subjects' actual HGSHS:A scores. Implications of the above for (a) working with clients who may not score that high on standard behavioral measures of hypnotizability (such as the HGSHS:A), or (b) understanding how hypnosis "works," are discussed.
研究对象为194名护理专业学生，他们参与了《哈佛群体催眠易感性量表A》（Shor & Orne，1962）测试，在该测试中，在眼部僵住项目之后、“倒数”环节之前嵌入了一段2分钟的安静坐姿时段。在完成《哈佛群体催眠易感性量表A》测试后，研究对象参照嵌入催眠诱导仪式中的安静坐姿时段，完成了《意识现象学量表》（PCI）（Pekala，1982，1991c）。研究对象被分为低易感性组和高易感性组。对研究对象在《意识现象学量表》上的回答进行K均值聚类分析，结果显示有九个不同的聚类组。这些组具有不同的现象学体验模式，这些模式与个体在《哈佛群体催眠易感性量表A》上的实际得分无关。本文讨论了上述结果对于（a）与在催眠易感性标准行为测量（如《哈佛群体催眠易感性量表A》）中得分可能不高的客户合作，或（b）理解催眠“如何起作用”的意义。
