• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Acute Stimulant Treatment and Reinforcement Increase the Speed of Information Accumulation in Children with ADHD.急性兴奋剂治疗与强化可提高多动症儿童的信息积累速度。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2017 Jul;45(5):911-920. doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0222-0.
2
Reinforcement and Stimulant Medication Ameliorate Deficient Response Inhibition in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.强化与刺激药物改善注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童的反应抑制缺陷
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2016 Feb;44(2):309-21. doi: 10.1007/s10802-015-0031-x.
3
Cognitive Effects of Stimulant, Guanfacine, and Combined Treatment in Child and Adolescent Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.兴奋剂、胍法辛及联合治疗对儿童和青少年注意力缺陷/多动障碍的认知影响
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;55(8):667-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2016.05.016. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
4
Reinforcement enhances vigilance among children with ADHD: comparisons to typically developing children and to the effects of methylphenidate.强化提高多动症儿童的警觉性:与正常发育儿童的比较及与哌甲酯效果的比较。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015 Jan;43(1):149-61. doi: 10.1007/s10802-014-9891-8.
5
Motivational incentives and methylphenidate enhance electrophysiological correlates of error monitoring in children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder.动机激励和哌醋甲酯增强了注意缺陷/多动障碍儿童错误监测的电生理相关性。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;54(8):836-45. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12069. Epub 2013 May 13.
6
The Unique and Combined Effects of Reinforcement and Methylphenidate on Temporal Information Processing in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.强化与哌甲酯对注意力缺陷多动障碍患者时间信息处理的独特及联合作用
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Aug;35(4):414-21. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000000349.
7
Differential impact of methylphenidate and atomoxetine on sustained attention in youth with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.哌甲酯和托莫西汀对注意力缺陷/多动障碍青少年持续注意力的不同影响。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015 Jan;56(1):40-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12272. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
8
Methylphenidate does not influence smoking-reinforced responding or attentional performance in adult smokers with and without attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).哌甲酯对患有和未患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的成年吸烟者的吸烟强化反应或注意力表现均无影响。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2013 Oct;21(5):375-84. doi: 10.1037/a0033851.
9
The spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) as an animal model of childhood hyperactivity (ADHD): changed reactivity to reinforcers and to psychomotor stimulants.自发性高血压大鼠(SHR)作为儿童多动症(ADHD)的动物模型:对强化物和精神运动兴奋剂的反应性改变。
Behav Neural Biol. 1992 Sep;58(2):103-12. doi: 10.1016/0163-1047(92)90315-u.
10
Improving working memory in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the separate and combined effects of incentives and stimulant medication.提高注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童的工作记忆:激励措施和兴奋剂药物的单独和联合作用。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2012 Oct;40(7):1193-207. doi: 10.1007/s10802-012-9627-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Target Selection Signals Causally Influence Human Perceptual Decision-Making.目标选择信号对人类感知决策产生因果影响。
J Neurosci. 2025 Jun 11;45(24):e2048242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2048-24.2025.
2
Neurophysiology of Perceptual Decision-Making and Its Alterations in Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.感知决策的神经生理学及其在注意力缺陷多动障碍中的改变
J Neurosci. 2025 Apr 2;45(14):e0469242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0469-24.2025.
3
Neurofeedback for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.注意力缺陷多动障碍的神经反馈:系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 1;82(2):118-129. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.3702.
4
Flexible adaptation of task-positive brain networks predicts efficiency of evidence accumulation.任务正激活脑网络的灵活适应度预测证据积累的效率。
Commun Biol. 2024 Jul 2;7(1):801. doi: 10.1038/s42003-024-06506-w.
5
A diffusion decision model analysis of the cognitive effects of neurofeedback for ADHD.注意力缺陷多动障碍神经反馈认知效应的扩散决策模型分析。
Neuropsychology. 2024 Feb;38(2):146-156. doi: 10.1037/neu0000932. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
6
Enhanced decision-making in nicotine dependent individuals who abstain: A computational analysis using Hierarchical Drift Diffusion Modeling.在戒烟的尼古丁依赖个体中增强决策能力:使用分层漂移扩散建模的计算分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 Sep 1;250:110890. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.110890. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
7
Methylphenidate for children and adolescents with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).哌醋甲酯治疗注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)儿童和青少年。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 27;3(3):CD009885. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009885.pub3.
8
Task-general efficiency of evidence accumulation as a computationally-defined neurocognitive trait: Implications for clinical neuroscience.作为一种通过计算定义的神经认知特征的任务通用证据积累效率:对临床神经科学的启示。
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2021 Jun;1(1):5-15. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
9
Neural Substrates of the Drift-Diffusion Model in Brain Disorders.脑部疾病中漂移扩散模型的神经基质
Front Comput Neurosci. 2022 Jan 7;15:678232. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2021.678232. eCollection 2021.
10
Neuropsychological Characterization of Aggressive Behavior in Children and Adolescents with CD/ODD and Effects of Single Doses of Medications: The Protocol of the Matrics_WP6-1 Study.患有对立违抗性障碍/品行障碍的儿童和青少年攻击行为的神经心理学特征及单剂量药物的影响:Matrics_WP6-1研究方案
Brain Sci. 2021 Dec 11;11(12):1639. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11121639.

本文引用的文献

1
Memory for Action Rules and Reaction Time Variability in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.注意缺陷多动障碍中动作规则记忆与反应时变异性
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2016 Mar;1(2):132-140. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
2
Using the Diffusion Model to Explain Cognitive Deficits in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.使用扩散模型解释注意力缺陷多动障碍中的认知缺陷。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2017 Jan;45(1):57-68. doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0151-y.
3
The interaction between reinforcement and inhibitory control in ADHD: A review and research guidelines.ADHD 中强化和抑制控制的相互作用:综述和研究指南。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Mar;44:94-111. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
4
Using Covert Response Activation to Test Latent Assumptions of Formal Decision-Making Models in Humans.利用隐蔽反应激活来测试人类正式决策模型的潜在假设。
J Neurosci. 2015 Jul 15;35(28):10371-85. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0078-15.2015.
5
Drift diffusion model of reward and punishment learning in schizophrenia: Modeling and experimental data.精神分裂症中奖惩学习的漂移扩散模型:建模与实验数据
Behav Brain Res. 2015 Sep 15;291:147-154. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.05.024. Epub 2015 May 22.
6
Reinforcement and Stimulant Medication Ameliorate Deficient Response Inhibition in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.强化与刺激药物改善注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童的反应抑制缺陷
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2016 Feb;44(2):309-21. doi: 10.1007/s10802-015-0031-x.
7
Evaluating cognitive and motivational accounts of greater reinforcement effects among children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.评估注意缺陷/多动障碍儿童中更强强化效应的认知和动机解释。
Behav Brain Funct. 2015 Apr 29;11:20. doi: 10.1186/s12993-015-0065-9.
8
Reinforcement enhances vigilance among children with ADHD: comparisons to typically developing children and to the effects of methylphenidate.强化提高多动症儿童的警觉性:与正常发育儿童的比较及与哌甲酯效果的比较。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015 Jan;43(1):149-61. doi: 10.1007/s10802-014-9891-8.
9
Commentary: From noise to insight? Reaction time variability in ADHD and autism spectrum disorders--a commentary on Karalunas et al. (2014).评论:从噪声到洞察?注意力缺陷多动障碍和自闭症谱系障碍中的反应时变异性——对卡拉卢纳斯等人(2014年)的评论
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;55(6):711-3. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12262.
10
Annual research review: Reaction time variability in ADHD and autism spectrum disorders: measurement and mechanisms of a proposed trans-diagnostic phenotype.年度研究综述:注意缺陷多动障碍和自闭症谱系障碍中的反应时变异性:一种拟议的跨诊断表型的测量与机制
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;55(6):685-710. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12217. Epub 2014 Mar 13.

急性兴奋剂治疗与强化可提高多动症儿童的信息积累速度。

Acute Stimulant Treatment and Reinforcement Increase the Speed of Information Accumulation in Children with ADHD.

作者信息

Fosco Whitney D, White Corey N, Hawk Larry W

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, SUNY, Buffalo, NY, USA.

Department of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2017 Jul;45(5):911-920. doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0222-0.

DOI:10.1007/s10802-016-0222-0
PMID:27787672
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10037188/
Abstract

The current studies utilized drift diffusion modeling (DDM) to examine how reinforcement and stimulant medication affect cognitive task performance in children with ADHD. In Study 1, children with (n = 25; 88 % male) and without ADHD (n = 33; 82 % male) completed a 2-choice discrimination task at baseline (100 trials) and again a week later under alternating reinforcement and no-reinforcement contingencies (400 trials total). In Study 2, participants with ADHD (n = 29; 72 % male) completed a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 0.3 and 0.6 mg/kg methylphenidate and completed the same task utilized in Study 1 at baseline (100 trials). Children with ADHD accumulated information at a much slower rate than controls, as evidenced by a lower drift rate. Groups were similar in nondecision time and boundary separation. Both reinforcement and stimulant medication markedly improved drift rate in children with ADHD (ds = 0.70 and 0.95 for reinforcement and methylphenidate, respectively); both treatments also reduced boundary separation (ds = 0.70 and 0.39). Reinforcement, which emphasized speeded accuracy, reduced nondecision time (d = 0.37), whereas stimulant medication increased nondecision time (d = 0.38). These studies provide initial evidence that frontline treatments for ADHD primarily impact cognitive performance in youth with ADHD by improving the speed/efficiency of information accumulation. Treatment effects on other DDM parameters may vary between treatments or interact with task parameters (number of trials, task difficulty). DDM, in conjunction with other approaches, may be helpful in clarifying the specific cognitive processes that are disrupted in ADHD, as well as the basic mechanisms that underlie the efficacy of ADHD treatments.

摘要

目前的研究采用漂移扩散模型(DDM)来检验强化和刺激性药物如何影响多动症儿童的认知任务表现。在研究1中,患有多动症的儿童(n = 25;88%为男性)和未患多动症的儿童(n = 33;82%为男性)在基线时(100次试验)完成了一项二选一辨别任务,一周后在交替强化和无强化条件下再次完成该任务(共400次试验)。在研究2中,患有多动症的参与者(n = 29;72%为男性)完成了一项0.3和0.6mg/kg哌甲酯的双盲、安慰剂对照试验,并在基线时(100次试验)完成了与研究1相同的任务。多动症儿童积累信息的速度比对照组慢得多,较低的漂移率证明了这一点。各组在非决策时间和边界分离方面相似。强化和刺激性药物均显著提高了多动症儿童的漂移率(强化和哌甲酯的效应量分别为0.70和0.95);两种治疗方法还降低了边界分离(效应量分别为0.70和0.39)。强调速度准确性的强化减少了非决策时间(效应量为0.37),而刺激性药物增加了非决策时间(效应量为0.38)。这些研究提供了初步证据,表明多动症的一线治疗主要通过提高信息积累的速度/效率来影响多动症青少年的认知表现。治疗对其他DDM参数的影响可能因治疗方法而异,或与任务参数(试验次数、任务难度)相互作用。DDM与其他方法相结合,可能有助于阐明多动症中被破坏的特定认知过程,以及多动症治疗效果背后的基本机制。