Ventura Alison K, Mennella Julie A
1 Monell Chemical Senses Center , Philadelphia, PA.
2 Department of Kinesiology, California Polytechnic State University , San Luis Obispo, CA.
Child Obes. 2017 Feb;13(1):44-52. doi: 10.1089/chi.2016.0122. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
As a group, bottle-fed infants are at higher risk for rapid weight gain compared with breast-fed infants. However, little is known about individual differences in feeding behaviors of bottle-feeding infants, as well as maternal and infant characteristics associated with bottle-feeding outcomes.
We conducted a 2-day, within-subject study of 21 formula-feeding dyads; the within-subject factor was feeding condition: mother-led (ML; mothers were given the instruction to feed their infants as they typically would) vs. infant-led (IL; the experimenter ensured feeding began when infants signaled hunger and ended when they rejected the bottle on three consecutive occasions). Intake was determined by bottle weight; feedings were video-recorded and later analyzed to determine feeding duration and types of satiation behaviors displayed. Percent difference scores were calculated for each outcome as [((ML - IL)/IL) × 100] to standardize differences among dyads. Mothers completed questionnaires of feeding styles and infant temperament.
On average, infants consumed ∼42% more formula during the ML- than IL-condition (p = 0.03). However, notable variation existed in difference scores for intake (range = -52.8% to 268.9%; higher scores reflect greater intake during ML than IL). Stepwise regression illustrated that greater intakes during the ML-condition were predicted by the combination of: (1) higher infant age; (2) lower levels of infant rhythmicity and adaptability; (3) higher levels of infant positive mood; and (4) lower levels of maternal restrictive and responsive feeding styles.
This objective, experimental approach illustrated that variation in bottle-feeding outcomes is associated with characteristics of both members of the dyad.
与母乳喂养的婴儿相比,人工喂养的婴儿群体体重快速增加的风险更高。然而,对于人工喂养婴儿喂养行为的个体差异,以及与人工喂养结果相关的母婴特征,我们知之甚少。
我们对21对人工喂养的母婴进行了一项为期2天的受试者内研究;受试者内因素为喂养条件:母亲主导(ML;母亲们按其通常的方式喂养婴儿)与婴儿主导(IL;实验者确保在婴儿发出饥饿信号时开始喂养,并在婴儿连续三次拒绝奶瓶时结束喂养)。摄入量通过奶瓶重量确定;喂养过程进行视频记录,随后进行分析以确定喂养持续时间和所表现出的饱腹感行为类型。计算每个结果的百分比差异分数为[((ML - IL)/IL)×100],以标准化各母婴对之间的差异。母亲们完成了喂养方式和婴儿气质的问卷调查。
平均而言,婴儿在母亲主导条件下比在婴儿主导条件下多摄入约42%的配方奶(p = 0.03)。然而,摄入量的差异分数存在显著差异(范围 = -52.8%至268.9%;分数越高表明在母亲主导条件下的摄入量比婴儿主导条件下的摄入量越高)。逐步回归表明,母亲主导条件下较高的摄入量可由以下因素共同预测:(1)婴儿年龄较大;(2)婴儿节律性和适应性水平较低;(3)婴儿积极情绪水平较高;(4)母亲限制型和反应型喂养方式水平较低。
这种客观的实验方法表明,人工喂养结果的差异与母婴双方的特征有关。