• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钬激光与传统(冷刀)直视下尿道内切开术治疗短段球部尿道狭窄的疗效分析

Holmium laser vs. conventional (cold knife) direct visual internal urethrotomy for short-segment bulbar urethral stricture: Outcome analysis.

作者信息

Jhanwar Ankur, Kumar Manoj, Sankhwar Satya Narayan, Prakash Gaurav

机构信息

King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.

出版信息

Can Urol Assoc J. 2016 May-Jun;10(5-6):E161-E164. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3382. Epub 2016 May 12.

DOI:10.5489/cuaj.3382
PMID:27790296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5065404/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Our goal was to analyze the outcome between holmium laser and cold knife direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) for short-segment bulbar urethral stricture.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study comprised of 112 male patients seen from June 2013 to December 2014. Inclusion criterion was short-segment bulbar urethral stricture (≤1.5cm). Exclusion criteria were prior intervention/urethroplasty, pan-anterior urethral strictures, posterior stenosis, urinary tract infection, and those who lost to followup. Patients were divided into two groups; Group A (n=58) included cold knife DVIU and group B (n=54) included holmium laser endourethrotomy patients. Patient followup included uroflowmetry at postoperative Day 3, as well as at three months and six months.

RESULTS

Baseline demographics were comparable in both groups. A total of 107 patients met the inclusion criteria and five patients were excluded due to inadequate followup. Mean stricture length was 1.31 ± 0.252 cm (p=0.53) and 1.34 ± 0.251 cm in Groups A and B, respectively. Mean operating time in Group A was 16.3 ± 1.78 min and in Group B was 20.96 ± 2.23 min (p=0.0001). Five patients in Group A had bleeding after the procedure that was managed conservatively by applying perineal compression. Three patients in Group B had fluid extravasation postoperatively. Qmax (ml/s) was found to be statistically insignificant between the two groups at all followups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both holmium laser and cold knife urethrotomy are safe and equally effective in treating short-segment bulbar urethral strictures in terms of outcome and complication rate. However, holmium laser requires more expertise and is a costly alternative.

摘要

引言

我们的目标是分析钬激光与冷刀直视下内尿道切开术(DVIU)治疗短段球部尿道狭窄的疗效。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,纳入了2013年6月至2014年12月期间就诊的112例男性患者。纳入标准为短段球部尿道狭窄(≤1.5cm)。排除标准为既往有干预/尿道成形术史、全前尿道狭窄、后尿道狭窄、尿路感染以及失访患者。患者分为两组;A组(n=58)采用冷刀DVIU,B组(n=54)采用钬激光尿道内切开术。患者随访包括术后第3天、3个月和6个月的尿流率检查。

结果

两组的基线人口统计学特征具有可比性。共有107例患者符合纳入标准,5例患者因随访不充分被排除。A组和B组的平均狭窄长度分别为1.31±0.252cm(p=0.53)和1.34±0.251cm。A组的平均手术时间为16.3±1.78分钟,B组为20.96±2.23分钟(p=0.0001)。A组有5例患者术后出血,通过会阴压迫保守治疗。B组有3例患者术后出现液体外渗。在所有随访中,两组之间的最大尿流率(ml/s)在统计学上无显著差异。

结论

就疗效和并发症发生率而言,钬激光和冷刀尿道切开术在治疗短段球部尿道狭窄方面都是安全且同样有效的。然而,钬激光需要更多的专业知识,且是一种成本较高的选择。

相似文献

1
Holmium laser vs. conventional (cold knife) direct visual internal urethrotomy for short-segment bulbar urethral stricture: Outcome analysis.钬激光与传统(冷刀)直视下尿道内切开术治疗短段球部尿道狭窄的疗效分析
Can Urol Assoc J. 2016 May-Jun;10(5-6):E161-E164. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.3382. Epub 2016 May 12.
2
Holmium laser versus cold knife visual internal urethrotomy for management of short segment urethral stricture: a prospective randomized clinical trial.钬激光与冷刀经尿道内切开术治疗短段尿道狭窄的前瞻性随机临床试验。
World J Urol. 2023 Jul;41(7):1897-1904. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04434-8. Epub 2023 May 31.
3
Evaluation of holmium laser versus cold knife in optical internal urethrotomy for the management of short segment urethral stricture.钬激光与冷刀用于光学尿道内切开术治疗短段尿道狭窄的疗效评估
Urol Ann. 2014 Oct;6(4):328-33. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.140997.
4
Holmium: YAG Versus Cold Knife Internal Urethrotomy in the Management of Short Urethral Strictures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.钬激光与冷刀内尿道切开术治疗短段尿道狭窄的随机对照试验
J Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Jul 18;12:e35. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2021.35. eCollection 2021.
5
Comparison of cold-knife optical internal urethrotomy and holmium:YAG laser internal urethrotomy in bulbar urethral strictures.冷刀光学内尿道切开术与钬激光内尿道切开术治疗球部尿道狭窄的比较
Cent European J Urol. 2018;71(1):114-120. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2017.1391. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
6
Comparative analysis of holmium: YAG laser internal urethrotomy versus Cold-Knife optical internal urethrotomy in the management of urethral stricture - a systematic review and meta-analysis.钬激光尿道内切开术与冷刀尿道内切开术治疗尿道狭窄的对比分析——系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Jul 1;110(7):4382-4392. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001384.
7
Use of holmium laser for urethral strictures in pediatrics: A prospective study.钬激光在小儿尿道狭窄治疗中的应用:一项前瞻性研究。
J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Feb;12(1):42.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.06.016. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
8
Visual internal urethrotomy for management of urethral strictures in boys: a comparison of short-term outcome of holmium laser versus cold knife.小儿尿道狭窄的可视内部尿道切开术:钬激光与冷刀短期疗效比较
Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Apr;50(4):605-609. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-1809-x. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
9
Low-power holmium:YAG laser urethrotomy for urethral stricture disease: comparison of outcomes with the cold-knife technique.低功率钬激光尿道切开术治疗尿道狭窄疾病:与冷刀技术的疗效比较。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2011 Nov;27(11):503-7. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2011.06.013.
10
Comparative study between thulium laser and cold knife visual urethrotomy for treatment of short bulbomembranous urethral stricture.钬激光与冷刀可视尿道切开术治疗短段球部膜部尿道狭窄的对比研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 2;101(35):e30235. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030235.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of laser versus cold knife visual internal urethrotomy in the treatment of urethral stricture (stricture length <2 cm): A systematic review and meta-analysis.激光与冷刀直视下尿道内切开术治疗尿道狭窄(狭窄长度<2厘米)的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 3;103(18):e37524. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037524.
2
Comparative study between thulium laser and cold knife visual urethrotomy for treatment of short bulbomembranous urethral stricture.钬激光与冷刀可视尿道切开术治疗短段球部膜部尿道狭窄的对比研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 2;101(35):e30235. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030235.
3
180-W GreenLight laser photoselective vaporization with multiple triamcinolone acetonide injections for the treatment of bladder neck contractures.180-W 绿光激光光选择性汽化联合多次曲安奈德注射治疗膀胱颈挛缩。
Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Oct;37(8):3115-3121. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03568-2. Epub 2022 May 2.
4
Canadian Urological Association guideline on male urethral stricture.加拿大泌尿外科协会男性尿道狭窄指南。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Oct;14(10):305-316. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6792.
5
Open urethroplasty versus endoscopic urethrotomy for recurrent urethral stricture in men: the OPEN RCT.男性复发性尿道狭窄的尿道切开术与开放尿道成形术的比较:OPEN RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(61):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta24610.
6
Comparison between cold knife and laser urethrotomy for urethral stricture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative trials.冷刀与激光尿道切开术治疗尿道狭窄的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析比较试验。
World J Urol. 2019 Dec;37(12):2785-2793. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02729-3. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
7
Stricture Urethra in Children: An Indian Perspective.儿童尿道狭窄:印度视角
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2018 Oct-Dec;23(4):192-197. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.JIAPS_146_17.
8
Comparison of cold-knife optical internal urethrotomy and holmium:YAG laser internal urethrotomy in bulbar urethral strictures.冷刀光学内尿道切开术与钬激光内尿道切开术治疗球部尿道狭窄的比较
Cent European J Urol. 2018;71(1):114-120. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2017.1391. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
9
Endoscopic Management of Urethral Stricture: Review and Practice Algorithm for Management of Male Urethral Stricture Disease.尿道狭窄的内镜治疗:男性尿道狭窄疾病管理的综述与实践算法
Curr Urol Rep. 2018 Feb 26;19(3):19. doi: 10.1007/s11934-018-0771-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of holmium laser versus cold knife in optical internal urethrotomy for the management of short segment urethral stricture.钬激光与冷刀用于光学尿道内切开术治疗短段尿道狭窄的疗效评估
Urol Ann. 2014 Oct;6(4):328-33. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.140997.
2
EAU guidelines on laser technologies.EAU 指南:激光技术
Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):783-95. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
3
Comparison of treatment results between holmium laser endourethrotomy and optical internal urethrotomy for urethral stricture.钬激光尿道内切开术与尿道内切开术治疗尿道狭窄的疗效比较。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Jun;44(3):717-24. doi: 10.1007/s11255-011-0094-8. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
4
Low-power holmium:YAG laser urethrotomy for urethral stricture disease: comparison of outcomes with the cold-knife technique.低功率钬激光尿道切开术治疗尿道狭窄疾病:与冷刀技术的疗效比较。
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2011 Nov;27(11):503-7. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2011.06.013.
5
Holmium laser urethrotomy for treatment of traumatic stricture urethra: a review of 78 patients.
J Pak Med Assoc. 2010 Oct;60(10):829-32.
6
Safety and efficacy of laser and cold knife urethrotomy for urethral stricture.激光和冷刀尿道切开术治疗尿道狭窄的安全性和有效性。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2010 Jun;123(12):1589-95.
7
The safety and efficacy of optical urethrotomy using a spongiosum block with sedation: a comparative nonrandomized study.使用海绵体阻滞联合镇静进行光学尿道切开术的安全性和有效性:一项非随机对照研究
J Urol. 2009 May;181(5):2134-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.01.017. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
8
The use of the diode laser for treating urethral strictures.二极管激光在治疗尿道狭窄中的应用。
BJU Int. 2001 Jun;87(9):831-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2001.02183.x.
9
Treatment of male urethral strictures: is repeated dilation or internal urethrotomy useful?男性尿道狭窄的治疗:反复扩张或内镜下尿道内切开术是否有效?
J Urol. 1998 Aug;160(2):356-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)62894-5.
10
Internal urethrotomy versus dilation as treatment for male urethral strictures: a prospective, randomized comparison.经尿道内切开术与尿道扩张术治疗男性尿道狭窄的前瞻性随机对照研究
J Urol. 1997 Jan;157(1):98-101.