Suppr超能文献

钬激光与冷刀内尿道切开术治疗短段尿道狭窄的随机对照试验

Holmium: YAG Versus Cold Knife Internal Urethrotomy in the Management of Short Urethral Strictures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Gamal Mohamed A, Higazy Ahmed, Ebskharoun Samuel F, Radwan Ahmed

机构信息

Ain Shams University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.

Maadi Military Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

J Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Jul 18;12:e35. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2021.35. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

our study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of Holmium: YAG laser internal urethrotomy compared to the cold knife internal urethrotomy. Eighty adult male patients presented with a urethral stricture less than 1.5 cm were included in our study; they were randomly allocated into 2 groups representing Holmium and cold knife internal urethrotomy. A careful evaluation with ascending cystourethrogram and uroflowmetry were done on all patients, and they were followed up for 1 year with uroflowmetry. Each group included 40 patients sharing the same demographic data. The most common cause of a urethral stricture in both groups was iatrogenic injury. The mean operative time of the cold knife urethrotomy procedure was 10.98 ± 2.40 minutes compared to 15.43 ± 2.48 minutes in the holmium laser urethrotomy group with a highly significant difference. The results showed success rates of 90% and 80% for the holmium laser and cold knife internal urethrotomy groups respectively. The perioperative complication according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, showed no statistically significant difference in grade 1 and 2 complications. A recurrence rate with the need for redo surgery representing grade 3B complication was seen in 4 cases in the Holmium group compared to 8 cases in the cold knife group with a statistically significant difference. Both Holmium Laser and cold knife internal urethrotomy are an effective surgical option for the treatment of a urethral stricture less than 1.5 cm with a promising outcome after 1-year follow-up with a better success rate using the Holmium laser.

摘要

我们的研究旨在评估钬激光尿道内切开术与冷刀尿道内切开术相比的安全性和有效性。本研究纳入了80例尿道狭窄小于1.5厘米的成年男性患者;他们被随机分为两组,分别接受钬激光尿道内切开术和冷刀尿道内切开术。对所有患者进行了逆行膀胱尿道造影和尿流率测定的仔细评估,并通过尿流率测定对他们进行了1年的随访。每组包括40例具有相同人口统计学数据的患者。两组中尿道狭窄最常见的原因是医源性损伤。冷刀尿道切开术的平均手术时间为10.98±2.40分钟,而钬激光尿道切开术组为15.43±2.48分钟,差异具有高度显著性。结果显示,钬激光组和冷刀尿道内切开术组的成功率分别为90%和80%。根据Clavien-Dindo分类法,围手术期并发症在1级和2级并发症方面无统计学显著差异。钬激光组有4例出现需要再次手术的复发率,代表3B级并发症,而冷刀组有8例,差异具有统计学显著性。钬激光尿道内切开术和冷刀尿道内切开术都是治疗小于1.5厘米尿道狭窄的有效手术选择,1年随访后预后良好,钬激光的成功率更高。

相似文献

10
Experience of 138 Transurethral Urethrotomy With Holmium:YAG Laser.138例钬激光经尿道尿道切开术的经验
J Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Spring;10(2):104-107. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2019.17. Epub 2019 Feb 25.

本文引用的文献

2
Experience of 138 Transurethral Urethrotomy With Holmium:YAG Laser.138例钬激光经尿道尿道切开术的经验
J Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Spring;10(2):104-107. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2019.17. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
4
Laser Application in Iran Urology: A Narrative Review.激光在伊朗泌尿外科的应用:一篇叙述性综述。
J Lasers Med Sci. 2018 Winter;9(1):1-6. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2018.01. Epub 2017 Dec 26.
9
EAU guidelines on laser technologies.EAU 指南:激光技术
Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):783-95. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Jan 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验