• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康冲击与风险规避。

Health shocks and risk aversion.

作者信息

Decker Simon, Schmitz Hendrik

机构信息

University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany; CINCH Health Economics Research Center, Germany; Ruhr Graduate School in Economics (RGS Econ), Germany.

CINCH Health Economics Research Center, Germany; University of Paderborn, Germany; RWI Essen, Germany.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2016 Dec;50:156-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Oct 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.09.006
PMID:27792902
Abstract

We empirically assess whether a health shock influences individual risk aversion. We use grip strength data to obtain an objective health shock indicator. In order to account for the non-random nature of our data regression-adjusted matching is employed. Risk preferences are traditionally assumed to be constant. However, we find that a health shock increases individual risk aversion. The finding is robust to a series of sensitivity analyses and persists for at least four years after the shock. Income changes do not seem to be the driving mechanism.

摘要

我们通过实证评估健康冲击是否会影响个体的风险厌恶程度。我们使用握力数据来获取一个客观的健康冲击指标。为了考虑数据的非随机性,我们采用了回归调整匹配法。传统上认为风险偏好是恒定不变的。然而,我们发现健康冲击会增加个体的风险厌恶程度。这一发现经过一系列敏感性分析后依然稳健,并且在冲击发生后至少持续四年。收入变化似乎并非驱动机制。

相似文献

1
Health shocks and risk aversion.健康冲击与风险规避。
J Health Econ. 2016 Dec;50:156-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
2
The Betrayal Aversion Elicitation Task: An Individual Level Betrayal Aversion Measure.背叛厌恶诱发任务:一种个体层面的背叛厌恶测量方法。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 2;10(9):e0137491. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137491. eCollection 2015.
3
Five-year-olds do not show ambiguity aversion in a risk and ambiguity task with physical objects.在涉及实物的风险和模糊性任务中,五岁儿童不会表现出模糊性厌恶。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Jul;159:319-326. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
4
In Sickness but Not in Wealth: Field Evidence on Patients' Risk Preferences in Financial and Health Domains.疾病面前而非财富面前:金融与健康领域患者风险偏好的实地证据
Med Decis Making. 2016 May;36(4):503-17. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15626406. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
5
[Association of hand grip strength with subjective health and work ability. results of the baseline survey of the lidA study].[握力与主观健康及工作能力的关联。LidA研究基线调查结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2015 Apr;77(4):e85-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1398602. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
6
Acceptable losses: the debatable origins of loss aversion.可接受的损失:损失规避的有争议起源。
Psychol Res. 2019 Oct;83(7):1327-1339. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1013-8. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
7
Health shocks, employment and income in the Spanish labour market.西班牙劳动力市场中的健康冲击、就业与收入
Health Econ. 2006 Sep;15(9):997-1009. doi: 10.1002/hec.1151.
8
Peer effects in risk aversion.风险规避中的同伴效应。
Risk Anal. 2015 Jan;35(1):27-43. doi: 10.1111/risa.12260. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
9
Association between hand-grip strength and depressive symptoms: Locomotive Syndrome and Health Outcomes in Aizu Cohort Study (LOHAS).手部握力与抑郁症状的关联:会津地区生活方式与健康预后研究(LOHAS)。
Age Ageing. 2015 Jul;44(4):592-8. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afv013. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
10
Health and social outcomes among children in low-income families and families receiving social assistance--a Swedish national cohort study.低收入家庭及接受社会救助家庭儿童的健康与社会结局——一项瑞典全国队列研究
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Jan;66(1):14-30. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.07.031. Epub 2007 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Association between health anxiety and self-triage decisions: evidence from a cross-sectional study with Australian emergency department non-urgent patients.健康焦虑与自我分诊决策之间的关联:来自一项针对澳大利亚急诊科非急症患者的横断面研究的证据。
BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 17;15(4):e090123. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090123.
2
Incentives, Health, and Retirement: Evidence From a Finnish Pension Reform.激励措施、健康与退休:来自芬兰养老金改革的证据。
Health Econ. 2025 Mar;34(3):537-572. doi: 10.1002/hec.4917. Epub 2024 Dec 23.
3
Decoding depression by exploring the exposome-genome edge amidst COVID-19 lockdown.
解析大疫情时代的“暴露组-基因组边缘”以探索抑郁症的奥秘
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 12;14(1):13562. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64200-7.
4
A study on the impact of health shocks on subjective wellbeing of middle-aged people and older adults-Evidence from China.健康冲击对中老年人主观幸福感的影响研究——来自中国的证据
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 11;11:1238026. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1238026. eCollection 2023.
5
Association of self-efficacy, risk attitudes, and time preferences with functioning in older patients with vertigo, dizziness, and balance disorders in a tertiary care setting-Results from the MobilE-TRA2 cohort.三级医疗环境中自我效能、风险态度和时间偏好与老年眩晕、头晕和平衡障碍患者功能的关联——来自MobilE-TRA2队列的结果
Front Neurol. 2023 Dec 15;14:1316081. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1316081. eCollection 2023.
6
Changes in retirement plans in the English older population during the COVID-19 pandemic: The roles of health factors and financial insecurity.新冠疫情期间英国老年人群退休计划的变化:健康因素和经济不安全感的作用
Eur J Ageing. 2023 Jun 13;20(1):22. doi: 10.1007/s10433-023-00770-1.
7
Health shocks, basic medical insurance and common prosperity: Based on the analysis of rural middle-aged and elderly groups.健康冲击、基本医疗保险与共同富裕:基于农村中老年群体的分析。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 9;10:1014351. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1014351. eCollection 2022.
8
On the stability of risk preferences: Measurement matters.论风险偏好的稳定性:测量至关重要。
Econ Lett. 2022 Jan;210:110172. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.110172. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
9
Restarting "Normal" Life after Covid-19 and the Lockdown: Evidence from Spain, the United Kingdom, and Italy.新冠疫情及封锁后重启“正常”生活:来自西班牙、英国和意大利的证据。
Soc Indic Res. 2021;158(1):241-265. doi: 10.1007/s11205-021-02697-5. Epub 2021 May 8.
10
Negative shocks predict change in cognitive function and preferences: assessing the negative affect and stress hypothesis.消极冲击可预测认知功能和偏好的变化:评估消极情绪和压力假说。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 11;11(1):3546. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83089-0.