• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在涉及实物的风险和模糊性任务中,五岁儿童不会表现出模糊性厌恶。

Five-year-olds do not show ambiguity aversion in a risk and ambiguity task with physical objects.

作者信息

Li Rosa, Roberts Rachel C, Huettel Scott A, Brannon Elizabeth M

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA; Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Jul;159:319-326. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.013
PMID:28359540
Abstract

Ambiguity aversion arises when a decision maker prefers risky gambles with known probabilities over equivalent ambiguous gambles with unknown probabilities. This phenomenon has been consistently observed in adults across a large body of empirical work. Evaluating ambiguity aversion in young children, however, has posed methodological challenges because probabilistic representations appropriate for adults might not be understood by young children. Here, we established a novel method for representing risk and ambiguity with physical objects that overcomes previous methodological limitations and allows us to measure ambiguity aversion in young children. We found that individual 5-year-olds exhibited consistent choice preferences and, as a group, exhibited no ambiguity aversion in a task that evokes ambiguity aversion in adults. Across individuals, 5-year-olds exhibited greater variance in ambiguity preferences compared with adults tested under similar conditions. This suggests that ambiguity aversion is absent during early childhood and emerges over the course of development.

摘要

当决策者偏好具有已知概率的风险赌博而非具有未知概率的等效模糊赌博时,就会出现模糊厌恶。在大量实证研究中,这一现象在成年人中一直被观察到。然而,评估幼儿的模糊厌恶存在方法上的挑战,因为适合成年人的概率表示可能幼儿无法理解。在此,我们建立了一种用实物表示风险和模糊性的新方法,该方法克服了以往方法上的局限性,使我们能够测量幼儿的模糊厌恶。我们发现,个体5岁儿童表现出一致的选择偏好,并且作为一个群体,在一项能引发成年人模糊厌恶的任务中未表现出模糊厌恶。在个体中,与在类似条件下测试的成年人相比,5岁儿童在模糊偏好上表现出更大的差异。这表明模糊厌恶在幼儿期不存在,而是在发育过程中出现的。

相似文献

1
Five-year-olds do not show ambiguity aversion in a risk and ambiguity task with physical objects.在涉及实物的风险和模糊性任务中,五岁儿童不会表现出模糊性厌恶。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Jul;159:319-326. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
2
Learning about the Ellsberg Paradox reduces, but does not abolish, ambiguity aversion.了解埃尔斯伯格悖论会减少但不会消除模糊厌恶。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 4;15(3):e0228782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228782. eCollection 2020.
3
Children do not exhibit ambiguity aversion despite intact familiarity bias.尽管存在完整的熟悉度偏差,但儿童并未表现出模糊厌恶。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 5;5:1519. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01519. eCollection 2014.
4
Does ambiguity aversion influence the framing effect during decision making?模糊规避在决策过程中会影响框架效应吗?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Apr;22(2):572-7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0688-0.
5
Dealing With Uncertainty: Testing Risk- and Ambiguity-Attitude Across Adolescence.应对不确定性:测试青少年时期的风险和模糊态度。
Dev Neuropsychol. 2016 Jan-Mar;41(1-2):77-92. doi: 10.1080/87565641.2016.1158265. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
6
Emotion and decision-making under uncertainty: Physiological arousal predicts increased gambling during ambiguity but not risk.不确定性下的情绪与决策:生理唤醒预示着在模糊情境而非风险情境下赌博行为的增加。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Oct;145(10):1255-1262. doi: 10.1037/xge0000205.
7
Size doesn't really matter: ambiguity aversion in Ellsberg urns with few balls.大小并非真正重要:小球数量较少的埃尔斯伯格瓮中的模糊厌恶。
Exp Psychol. 2008;55(1):31-7. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.1.31.
8
Ambiguity aversion in schizophrenia: An fMRI study of decision-making under risk and ambiguity.精神分裂症中的模糊厌恶:一项关于风险和模糊情境下决策的功能磁共振成像研究。
Schizophr Res. 2016 Dec;178(1-3):94-101. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
9
Neural Mechanisms Underlying Risk and Ambiguity Attitudes.风险和模糊态度的神经机制。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Nov;29(11):1845-1859. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01162. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
10
On the composition of risk preference and belief.论风险偏好与信念的构成。
Psychol Rev. 2004 Jan;111(1):236-41. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.236.

引用本文的文献

1
What's in the Box? Preschoolers Consider Ambiguity, Expected Value, and Information for Future Decisions in Explore-Exploit Tasks.盒子里有什么?学龄前儿童在探索-利用任务中考虑模糊性、预期价值和信息以用于未来决策。
Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Oct 27;7:855-878. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00110. eCollection 2023.
2
Developmental perspectives on risky and impulsive choice.发展视角下的风险与冲动选择。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Feb 18;374(1766):20180133. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0133.
3
Flexing dual-systems models: How variable cognitive control in children informs our understanding of risk-taking across development.
灵活运用双系统模型:儿童可变的认知控制如何增进我们对整个发展过程中冒险行为的理解。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2017 Oct;27:91-98. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.08.007. Epub 2017 Aug 16.