• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

论风险偏好的稳定性:测量至关重要。

On the stability of risk preferences: Measurement matters.

作者信息

Adema Joop, Nikolka Till, Poutvaara Panu, Sunde Uwe

机构信息

ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, Poschingerstraße 5, Munich, 81679, Germany.

University of Munich (LMU), Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, Munich, 80539, Germany.

出版信息

Econ Lett. 2022 Jan;210:110172. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.110172. Epub 2021 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.econlet.2021.110172
PMID:36540652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9754807/
Abstract

We exploit the unique design of a repeated survey experiment among students in four countries to explore the stability of risk preferences in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Relative to a baseline before the pandemic, we find that self-assessed willingness to take risks decreased while the willingness to take risks in an incentivized lottery task increased, for the same sample of respondents. These findings suggest domain specificity of preferences that is partly reflected in the different measures.

摘要

我们利用在四个国家的学生中进行的重复调查实验的独特设计,来探究在新冠疫情背景下风险偏好的稳定性。相对于疫情之前的基线水平,我们发现,对于相同的受访者样本,自我评估的冒险意愿下降了,而在有激励的彩票任务中的冒险意愿增加了。这些发现表明偏好具有领域特异性,这在不同的测量方法中得到了部分体现。

相似文献

1
On the stability of risk preferences: Measurement matters.论风险偏好的稳定性:测量至关重要。
Econ Lett. 2022 Jan;210:110172. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.110172. Epub 2021 Nov 27.
2
How the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic impacted pro-social behaviour and individual preferences: Experimental evidence from China.新冠疫情的爆发如何影响亲社会行为和个人偏好:来自中国的实验证据。
J Econ Behav Organ. 2021 Oct;190:480-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
3
The effect of framing and communicating COVID-19 vaccine side-effect risks on vaccine intentions for adults in the UK and the USA: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.在英国和美国,针对成年人的 COVID-19 疫苗副作用风险的描述和沟通对疫苗接种意愿的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Sep 6;22(1):592. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05484-2.
4
On the stability of risk and time preferences amid the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间风险与时间偏好的稳定性
Exp Econ. 2022;25(3):759-794. doi: 10.1007/s10683-021-09727-6. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
5
Stability of Risk Preferences During COVID-19: Evidence From Four Measurements.新冠疫情期间风险偏好的稳定性:来自四项测量的证据
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 10;12:702028. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702028. eCollection 2021.
6
Students' preferences for returning to colleges and universities during the COVID-19 pandemic: A discrete choice experiment.新冠疫情期间学生对重返高校的偏好:一项离散选择实验
Socioecon Plann Sci. 2022 Aug;82:101266. doi: 10.1016/j.seps.2022.101266. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
7
Survey measures versus incentivized measures of risk preferences: Evidence from sex workers' risky sexual transactions.调查测量与激励性风险偏好测量:性工作者风险性行为的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Oct;238:112497. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112497. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
8
Farmers' Risk Preferences in Rural China: Measurements and Determinants.中国农村地区农民的风险偏好:测量与决定因素
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jun 30;14(7):713. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14070713.
9
Using Survey Questions to Measure Preferences: Lessons from an Experimental Validation in Kenya.运用调查问卷衡量偏好:来自肯尼亚一项实验验证的经验教训
Eur Econ Rev. 2020 Aug;127. doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103493. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
10
Predicting medical practices using various risk attitude measures.利用各种风险态度衡量标准预测医疗行为。
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Jul;19(6):843-860. doi: 10.1007/s10198-017-0925-3. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Changes in Risk Tolerance for Ovarian Cancer Prevention Strategies during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results of a Discrete Choice Experiment.COVID-19大流行期间卵巢癌预防策略的风险承受能力变化:一项离散选择实验的结果
Med Decis Making. 2025 Feb;45(2):168-176. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241302829. Epub 2024 Dec 25.
2
Does the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown affect risk attitudes?-Evidence from rural Thailand.新冠疫情封锁是否会影响风险态度?——来自泰国农村的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 19;18(10):e0292873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292873. eCollection 2023.
3
What drives the acceptability of restrictive health policies: An experimental assessment of individual preferences for anti-COVID 19 strategies.是什么推动了限制性健康政策的可接受性:对个体对新冠疫情防控策略偏好的实验性评估。
Econ Model. 2022 Nov;116:106047. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2022.106047. Epub 2022 Sep 14.

本文引用的文献

1
On the stability of risk and time preferences amid the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间风险与时间偏好的稳定性
Exp Econ. 2022;25(3):759-794. doi: 10.1007/s10683-021-09727-6. Epub 2021 Aug 13.
2
Are Risk Preferences Stable?风险偏好是稳定的吗?
J Econ Perspect. 2018;32(2):135-54.
3
Health shocks and risk aversion.健康冲击与风险规避。
J Health Econ. 2016 Dec;50:156-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Oct 8.