Fang Lin, Sanchez Alvaro, Koster Ernst H W
Ghent University, Belgium.
Ghent University, Belgium.
Biol Psychol. 2017 Feb;123:278-285. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
The attentional scope model of rumination predicts that rumination is associated with a narrowed attentional scope which magnifies emotional responding and reduces problem-solving. This study examined this prediction by using a moving window paradigm, allowing for a more direct measurement of attentional scope at a perceptual level. High and low trait ruminators were asked to read self-related and other-related sentences under small, medium, large, and no moving window conditions while their visual fixations during reading were recorded. Results showed significant group differences in the small window size condition, with the high rumination group processing faster and making fewer fixations when reading the sentences. Further analyses confirmed that differences remained after controlling for mood state and the level of depression. These findings indicate that people with high levels of trait rumination are characterized by a narrower attentional scope when processing information. Clinical implications in relation to rumination are discussed.
沉思的注意范围模型预测,沉思与注意范围缩小有关,这会放大情绪反应并减少问题解决能力。本研究通过使用移动窗口范式检验了这一预测,从而能够在感知层面更直接地测量注意范围。高特质沉思者和低特质沉思者被要求在小、中、大及无移动窗口条件下阅读与自我相关和与他人相关的句子,同时记录他们阅读时的视觉注视情况。结果显示,在小窗口大小条件下存在显著的组间差异,高沉思组在阅读句子时处理速度更快且注视次数更少。进一步分析证实,在控制情绪状态和抑郁水平后差异依然存在。这些发现表明,高特质沉思者在处理信息时的特点是注意范围更窄。文中讨论了与沉思相关的临床意义。