Fisher Celia B, True Gala, Alexander Leslie, Fried Adam L
Fordham University.
University of Pennsylvania.
AJOB Prim Res. 2013;4(3):27-38. doi: 10.1080/21507716.2013.806969. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
The role of front-line researchers, those whose responsibilities include face-to-face contact with participants, is critical to ensuring the responsible conduct of community-based drug use research. To date, there has been little empirical examination of how front-line researchers perceive the effectiveness of ethical procedures in their real-world application and the moral stress they may experience when adherence to scientific procedures appears to conflict with participant protections.
This study represents a first step in applying psychological science to examine the work-related attitudes, ethics climate, and moral dilemmas experienced by a national sample of 275 front-line staff members whose responsibilities include face-to-face interaction with participants in community-based drug-use research. Using an anonymous Web-based survey we psychometrically evaluated and examined relationships among six new scales tapping moral stress (frustration in response to perceived barriers to conducting research in a morally appropriate manner); organizational ethics climate; staff support; moral practice dilemmas (perceived conflicts between scientific integrity and participant welfare); research commitment; and research mistrust.
As predicted, front-line researchers who evidence a strong commitment to their role in the research process and who perceive their organizations as committed to research ethics and staff support experienced lower levels of moral stress. Front-line researchers who were distrustful of the research enterprise and frequently grappled with moral practice dilemmas reported higher levels of moral stress.
Applying psychometrically reliable scales to empirically examine research ethics challenges can illuminate specific threats to scientific integrity and human subjects protections encountered by front-line staff and suggest organizational strategies for reducing moral stress and enhancing the responsible conduct of research.
一线研究人员的角色对于确保基于社区的药物使用研究的负责任开展至关重要,他们的职责包括与参与者进行面对面接触。迄今为止,很少有实证研究考察一线研究人员如何看待伦理程序在实际应用中的有效性,以及当遵守科学程序似乎与保护参与者相冲突时他们可能经历的道德压力。
本研究是将心理学应用于考察275名一线工作人员的工作相关态度、伦理氛围和道德困境的第一步,这些人员的职责包括在基于社区的药物使用研究中与参与者进行面对面互动。我们使用基于网络的匿名调查,从心理测量学角度评估并检验了六个新量表之间的关系,这些量表分别涉及道德压力(因认为在道德适当的方式下开展研究存在障碍而产生的挫败感)、组织伦理氛围、员工支持、道德实践困境(科学诚信与参与者福利之间的感知冲突)、研究承诺和研究不信任。
正如预测的那样,那些对自己在研究过程中的角色有强烈承诺,且认为其组织致力于研究伦理和员工支持的一线研究人员,经历的道德压力水平较低。那些对研究事业不信任且经常陷入道德实践困境的一线研究人员,报告的道德压力水平较高。
应用心理测量学上可靠的量表对研究伦理挑战进行实证研究,可以揭示一线工作人员在科学诚信和人类受试者保护方面遇到的具体威胁,并提出减少道德压力和加强负责任研究行为的组织策略。