Suppr超能文献

利用药房配药数据来衡量口服降糖药的依从性并识别不依从情况。

Use of pharmacy dispensing data to measure adherence and identify nonadherence with oral hypoglycemic agents.

作者信息

Sodihardjo-Yuen Fong, van Dijk Liset, Wensing Michel, De Smet Peter A G M, Teichert Martina

机构信息

Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association, 2514 JL, The Hague, the Netherlands.

Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Feb;73(2):205-213. doi: 10.1007/s00228-016-2149-3. Epub 2016 Oct 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

A framework for calculation of adherence for oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) based on data from health-insurance claims is available. Pharmacy dispensing data aid identification of nonadherent patients in pharmacy practices. However, use of these data for calculation of OHA adherence requires additional methodological categories. We examined the impact of different methodological choices on estimation of OHA adherence using pharmacy dispensing data.

METHODS

Four methodological categories were added to the framework available to be used for adherence calculation with pharmacy dispensing data. Three adherence measures were defined to supply pharmacists with significant information on OHA use of their patients: (i) percentage of days covered by use periods of dispensed medication (PDC), (ii) mean rate of adherent patients with a PDC ≥80 % (MRAP80), and (iii) mean number of nonadherent patients (MNNP80) per pharmacy with a PDC <80 %. A basic scenario was developed from 16 methodological categories. Consequences of choices for different parameters within these categories on the scores of the three adherence measures were calculated from dispensing data between July 2013 and July 2014.

RESULTS

Data were available for 604,500 OHA users in 1737 community pharmacies in the Netherlands. For the basic scenario, mean PDC for OHA was 88.3 %. MRAP80 was 80.3 %, which corresponded to an average of 69 nonadherent patients per pharmacy. Different choices for parameter values resulted in score variations for PDC of 85.0-91.8 %, for MRAP80 of 75.3-86.1 %, and between 49 and 92 MNNP80 per pharmacy.

CONCLUSION

Sixteen methodological categories specified calculation of OHA adherence based on pharmacy dispensing data. Adherence scores expressed as percentages were relatively robust to variation in parameter values, but differed substantially for the absolute numbers of nonadherent patients per pharmacy.

摘要

目的

基于医疗保险理赔数据计算口服降糖药(OHA)依从性的框架已经存在。药房配药数据有助于在药房实践中识别不依从的患者。然而,使用这些数据计算OHA依从性需要额外的方法类别。我们使用药房配药数据研究了不同方法选择对OHA依从性估计的影响。

方法

在可用于根据药房配药数据计算依从性的框架中增加了四个方法类别。定义了三种依从性测量方法,为药剂师提供有关其患者OHA使用情况的重要信息:(i)配药用药期覆盖天数百分比(PDC),(ii)PDC≥80%的依从患者平均率(MRAP80),以及(iii)每个药房中PDC<80%的不依从患者平均数量(MNNP80)。从16个方法类别中制定了一个基本方案。根据2013年7月至2014年7月的配药数据,计算了这些类别中不同参数选择对三种依从性测量分数的影响。

结果

荷兰1737家社区药房中604,500名OHA使用者的数据可用。对于基本方案,OHA的平均PDC为88.3%。MRAP80为80.3%,相当于每个药房平均有69名不依从患者。参数值的不同选择导致PDC的分数变化范围为85.0 - 91.8%,MRAP80的分数变化范围为75.3 - 86.1%,每个药房的MNNP80在49至92之间。

结论

16个方法类别规定了基于药房配药数据计算OHA依从性的方法。以百分比表示的依从性分数对参数值的变化相对稳健,但每个药房不依从患者的绝对数量差异很大。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Interventions for enhancing medication adherence.提高药物依从性的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 20;2014(11):CD000011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000011.pub4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验