de Andrade Dominique, Kinner Stuart A
Griffith Criminology Institute and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Tob Control. 2016 Sep;26(5):495-501. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053297. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
We conducted a systematic review to examine the impact of smoking cessation interventions, including smoking bans, on prisoners and prison staff.
We systematically searched health and criminal justice databases for relevant studies. Search strings were used to combine terms related to smoking cessation interventions with terms related to incarceration. We used forward and backward snowballing to capture additional studies.
Studies were included if: they were published between 1 January 1994 and 23 May 2016; the population was incarcerated adults and/or prison staff; they had a quantitative component; they were published in English; and they reported outcomes of a smoking cessation programme/ban with regard to reported change in smoking behaviour and/or behavioural outcomes.
Studies were reviewed for methodological rigour using the Effective Public Health Practice Project's Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Data were independently reviewed for methodological quality by 1 author and a research assistant.
Cessation programmes, including free nicotine replacement therapy and/or behavioural counselling can significantly increase the likelihood of quitting in prison and increase abstinence postrelease. Indoor bans have little impact on prisoner smoking behaviour. Prisoners who experience a complete smoking ban typically resume smoking shortly after release from prison. Bans may result in adverse behavioural outcomes, but these are generally minimal and short-lived.
While there is limited evidence to inform tobacco control policies in custodial settings, outcomes of this review suggest that cessation programmes/bans can be an effective mechanism to interrupt prisoner smoking behaviour when properly enforced.
我们进行了一项系统评价,以研究戒烟干预措施(包括禁烟)对囚犯和监狱工作人员的影响。
我们系统地检索了健康和刑事司法数据库中的相关研究。使用检索词将与戒烟干预措施相关的术语与与监禁相关的术语相结合。我们采用向前和向后滚雪球的方法来获取更多研究。
纳入的研究需满足以下条件:发表于1994年1月1日至2016年5月23日之间;研究对象为被监禁的成年人和/或监狱工作人员;有定量研究部分;以英文发表;报告了戒烟计划/禁令在吸烟行为报告变化和/或行为结果方面的结果。
使用有效公共卫生实践项目的定量研究质量评估工具对研究的方法严谨性进行审查。由1名作者和1名研究助理独立审查数据的方法学质量。
戒烟计划,包括免费尼古丁替代疗法和/或行为咨询,可显著增加在监狱中戒烟的可能性,并提高出狱后的戒烟率。室内禁烟对囚犯吸烟行为影响不大。经历全面禁烟的囚犯通常在出狱后不久就会恢复吸烟。禁令可能会导致不良行为结果,但通常程度较轻且持续时间较短。
虽然为监禁场所的烟草控制政策提供依据的证据有限,但本评价的结果表明,戒烟计划/禁令在妥善实施时可成为中断囚犯吸烟行为的有效机制。