Wolf Adam, Anderegg William R L, Pacala Stephen W
Arable Labs, Inc., Princeton, NJ 08540;
Department of Biology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 15;113(46):E7222-E7230. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1615144113. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
For over 40 y the dominant theory of stomatal behavior has been that plants should open stomates until the carbon gained by an infinitesimal additional opening balances the additional water lost times a water price that is constant at least over short periods. This theory has persisted because of its remarkable success in explaining strongly supported simple empirical models of stomatal conductance, even though we have also known for over 40 y that the theory is not consistent with competition among plants for water. We develop an alternative theory in which plants maximize carbon gain without pricing water loss and also add two features to both this and the classical theory, which are strongly supported by empirical evidence: (i) water flow through xylem that is progressively impaired as xylem water potential drops and (ii) fitness or carbon costs associated with low water potentials caused by a variety of mechanisms, including xylem damage repair. We show that our alternative carbon-maximization optimization is consistent with plant competition because it yields an evolutionary stable strategy (ESS)-species with the ESS stomatal behavior that will outcompete all others. We further show that, like the classical theory, the alternative theory also explains the functional forms of empirical stomatal models. We derive ways to test between the alternative optimization criteria by introducing a metric-the marginal xylem tension efficiency, which quantifies the amount of photosynthesis a plant will forego from opening stomatal an infinitesimal amount more to avoid a drop in water potential.
四十多年来,气孔行为的主流理论一直认为,植物应打开气孔,直到极小的额外开口所获得的碳,与额外损失的水分乘以至少在短时间内保持恒定的水价达到平衡。该理论一直存在,是因为它在解释得到有力支持的气孔导度简单经验模型方面取得了显著成功,尽管我们四十多年来也知道该理论与植物间的水分竞争不一致。我们提出了一种替代理论,即植物在不考虑水分损失代价的情况下最大化碳获取量,并且在该理论和经典理论中都加入了两个有实证依据大力支持的特征:(i)随着木质部水势下降,木质部中的水流会逐渐受到损害;(ii)由多种机制(包括木质部损伤修复)导致的低水势所带来的适合度或碳成本。我们表明,我们的替代碳最大化优化与植物竞争是一致的,因为它产生了一种进化稳定策略(ESS)——具有ESS气孔行为的物种将胜过所有其他物种。我们进一步表明,与经典理论一样,替代理论也能解释经验气孔模型的函数形式。我们通过引入一个指标——边际木质部张力效率,得出了在替代优化标准之间进行检验的方法,该指标量化了植物为避免水势下降而多打开极小量气孔时将放弃的光合作用量。