Russell Elizabeth S, Zheteyeva Yenlik, Gao Hongjiang, Shi Jianrong, Rainey Jeanette J, Thoroughman Douglas, Uzicanin Amra
Division of Epidemiology and Health Planning, Kentucky Department for Public Health, Frankfort; Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer.
Division of Global Migration and Quarantine.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2016 May 25;3(3):ofw113. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofw113. eCollection 2016 Sep.
School closures are an important mitigation strategy during influenza pandemic: if implemented early in a local outbreak, they can slow the disease spread in the surrounding community. During seasonal influenza epidemics, school closures may occur reactively, after the disease is already widespread in the community. Such reactive closures are often too late to reduce influenza transmission. However, they can provide data to determine under which circumstances they might be effective in reducing influenza-like illness (ILI) transmission. We conducted a household survey in a school district in Kentucky. District A closed after high student absenteeism due to influenza-like illness (ILI), whereas adjacent Districts B and C remained open. We collected data on self-reported ILI among household members in these 3 districts 2 weeks before the District A closure, during closure, and 2 weeks after reopening, and we evaluated economic and social consequences of school closure on student households in District A. The difference-in-differences method was applied to compare changes in ILI rates from before to after closure between districts. Estimated average daily ILI rate decreased less in District A than in District B or C for the entire sample and when stratified by age groups (0-5 years old, 6-18 years old, and above 18 years old). Twenty-five percent of District A households reported ≥1 closure-related economic or social difficulty. Closing schools after a widespread ILI activity in District A did not reduce ILI transmission but caused difficulties for some households.
在流感大流行期间,学校停课是一项重要的缓解策略:如果在当地疫情爆发初期实施,可减缓疾病在周边社区的传播。在季节性流感流行期间,学校停课可能是在疾病已在社区广泛传播后被动进行的。这种被动停课往往为时已晚,无法减少流感传播。然而,它们可为确定在何种情况下可能有效减少流感样疾病(ILI)传播提供数据。
我们在肯塔基州的一个学区进行了一项家庭调查。A区在因流感样疾病(ILI)导致学生高缺勤率后停课,而相邻的B区和C区仍正常上课。我们收集了这三个区的家庭成员在A区停课两周前、停课期间以及重新开学后两周内自我报告的ILI数据,并评估了A区学校停课对学生家庭的经济和社会影响。采用差异法比较各区停课前后ILI发病率的变化。
对于整个样本以及按年龄组(0至5岁、6至18岁和18岁以上)分层时,A区估计的平均每日ILI发病率下降幅度小于B区或C区。A区25%的家庭报告了≥1项与停课相关的经济或社会困难。
在A区流感样疾病广泛传播后关闭学校并未减少ILI传播,但给一些家庭带来了困难。