Suppr超能文献

印度德里部分专业人士对安乐死的认知与态度

Awareness and Attitude of Select Professionals toward Euthanasia in Delhi, India.

作者信息

Singh Sheetal, Gupta Shakti, Singh I B, Madaan Nirupam

机构信息

Department of Hospital Administration, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Indian J Palliat Care. 2016 Oct-Dec;22(4):485-490. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.191856.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The topic of euthanasia has induced differences not only among professionals in the medical fraternity but also in other fields as well. The dying process is being lengthened by the new state of art technologies erupting as such higher pace, and it is at the expense of standard quality of life and of a gracious death.

AIM

To study the awareness and attitude toward euthanasia among select professionals in Delhi.

METHODOLOGY

It was a questionnaire-based descriptive cross-sectional study. The study population included doctors, nurses, judges, lawyers, journalist, and social activists of Delhi. Tool included a sociodemographic questionnaire, two questions to know awareness regarding euthanasia and a modified euthanasia attitude scale used to measure attitude toward euthanasia. Data were analyzed using Stata 11.2.

RESULTS

Through our study, it is evident that professionals who participated in the study (judges, advocates, doctors, nurses, journalists, and social activists) in Delhi were familiar with the term euthanasia. No significant difference was seen in the attitude of professionals of different age group and sex toward euthanasia.

CONCLUSION

Through this study, it is found that judiciary group most strongly endorsed euthanasia. The attitude of doctors was elicited from mixed group with doctors belonging to different specialties. Oncologists are not in favor of any form of euthanasia. However, doctors from other specialties did support euthanasia.

摘要

引言

安乐死这一话题不仅在医学界专业人士中引发了分歧,在其他领域也是如此。随着新技术以如此高的速度涌现,死亡过程被延长,而这是以标准生活质量和安详死亡为代价的。

目的

研究德里特定专业人士对安乐死的认知和态度。

方法

这是一项基于问卷的描述性横断面研究。研究人群包括德里的医生、护士、法官、律师、记者和社会活动家。工具包括一份社会人口学问卷、两个了解对安乐死认知的问题以及一个用于测量对安乐死态度的改良安乐死态度量表。数据使用Stata 11.2进行分析。

结果

通过我们的研究,很明显参与研究的德里专业人士(法官、律师、医生、护士、记者和社会活动家)熟悉安乐死这个术语。不同年龄组和性别的专业人士对安乐死的态度没有显著差异。

结论

通过这项研究发现,司法群体最强烈支持安乐死。医生的态度是从包括不同专业的医生的混合群体中得出的。肿瘤学家不支持任何形式的安乐死。然而,其他专业的医生确实支持安乐死。

相似文献

1
Awareness and Attitude of Select Professionals toward Euthanasia in Delhi, India.
Indian J Palliat Care. 2016 Oct-Dec;22(4):485-490. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.191856.
2
Attitudes of oncologists, family doctors, medical students and lawyers to euthanasia.
Support Care Cancer. 1998 Jul;6(4):410-5. doi: 10.1007/s005200050185.
3
Health professionals' attitude toward euthanasia: a cross-sectional study from Turkey.
Omega (Westport). 2006;54(2):135-45. doi: 10.2190/5492-3833-7541-3160.
5
Turkish health professional's attitude toward euthanasia.
Omega (Westport). 2008;57(1):93-112. doi: 10.2190/OM.57.1.e.
7
Literacy and Attitude Toward Suicide Among Doctors and Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 7;16(7):e64032. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64032. eCollection 2024 Jul.
9
Reliability and validity of the Euthanasia Attitude Scale (EAS) for Hong Kong medical doctors.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2010 Aug;27(5):320-4. doi: 10.1177/1049909109358407. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Awareness and attitudes toward euthanasia: A cross-sectional study among diverse demographic groups in India.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Jun;14(6):2538-2543. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_175_25. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
2
"Healthcare professionals' attitudes towards euthanasia in the Balearic Islands.".
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Jul 19;26(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01262-w.
3
Nurses' opinions on euthanasia in Spain: an evaluation using a new version of the EAS.
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jul 29;23(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02176-5.
5
Anticipated impacts of voluntary assisted dying legislation on nursing practice.
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Sep;29(6):1386-1400. doi: 10.1177/09697330211022409. Epub 2022 May 27.
6
Analysis of Factors Influencing Polish Students' Opinions on Euthanasia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 20;19(9):5019. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095019.
7
Demonstrating the importance of cultural considerations at end of life utilizing the perspective of Indian patients with cancer.
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Mar;30(3):2515-2525. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06656-1. Epub 2021 Nov 17.

本文引用的文献

2
Euthanasia: An Indian perspective.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;54(2):177-83. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.99537.
4
Preferences for receiving information among frail older adults and their informal caregivers: a qualitative study.
Fam Pract. 2012 Dec;29(6):742-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cms033. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
5
Attitudes towards euthanasia and assisted suicide: a comparison between psychiatrists and other physicians.
Bioethics. 2013 Sep;27(7):402-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.01968.x. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
7
Legalizing euthanasia or assisted suicide: the illusion of safeguards and controls.
Curr Oncol. 2011 Apr;18(2):e38-45. doi: 10.3747/co.v18i2.883.
8
Should euthanasia be legal? An international survey of neonatal intensive care units staff.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 Jan;89(1):F19-24. doi: 10.1136/fn.89.1.f19.
9
Euthanasia, assisted suicide, and the philosophical anthropology of Karol Wojtyla.
Christ Bioeth. 2001 Dec;7(3):379-402. doi: 10.1076/chbi.7.3.379.6878.
10
Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: a review of the empirical data from the United States.
Arch Intern Med. 2002 Jan 28;162(2):142-52. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.2.142.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验