Suppr超能文献

安乐死:印度视角。

Euthanasia: An Indian perspective.

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Central Institute of Psychiatry, Kanke, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.

出版信息

Indian J Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;54(2):177-83. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.99537.

Abstract

In our society, the palliative care and quality of life issues in patients with terminal illnesses like advanced cancer and AIDS have become an important concern for clinicians. Parallel to this concern has arisen another controversial issue-euthanasia or "mercy -killing" of terminally ill patients. Proponents of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) feel that an individual's right to autonomy automatically entitles him to choose a painless death. The opponents feel that a physician's role in the death of an individual violates the central tenet of the medical profession. Moreover, undiagnosed depression and possibility of social 'coercion' in people asking for euthanasia put a further question mark on the ethical principles underlying such an act. These concerns have led to strict guidelines for implementing PAS. Assessment of the mental state of the person consenting to PAS becomes mandatory and here, the role of the psychiatrist becomes pivotal. Although considered illegal in our country, PAS has several advocates in the form of voluntary organizations like "death with dignity" foundation. This has got a fillip in the recent Honourable Supreme Court Judgment in the Aruna Shaunbag case. What remains to be seen is how long it takes before this sensitive issue rattles the Indian legislature.

摘要

在我们的社会中,晚期癌症和艾滋病等绝症患者的姑息治疗和生活质量问题已成为临床医生关注的重要问题。伴随着这种关注,出现了另一个有争议的问题——安乐死或对绝症患者的“仁慈杀害”。支持医生协助自杀(PAS)的人认为,个人的自主权权利自动使他有权选择无痛死亡。反对者认为,医生在一个人死亡中的角色违反了医疗行业的核心原则。此外,未经诊断的抑郁症和要求安乐死的人可能存在社会“胁迫”,这使得这种行为的伦理原则进一步受到质疑。这些担忧导致了严格的 PAS 实施指南。对同意 PAS 的人的精神状态进行评估已成为强制性要求,在这里,精神科医生的作用至关重要。尽管在我国被视为非法,但 PAS 有一些以“有尊严地死亡”基金会等自愿组织的形式的支持者。在最近的 Aruna Shaunbag 案中,Honourable Supreme Court 判决使这个问题得到了推动。尚待观察的是,这个敏感问题需要多长时间才能撼动印度立法机构。

相似文献

1
Euthanasia: An Indian perspective.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2012 Apr;54(2):177-83. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.99537.
3
Physician-assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in Indian Context: Sooner or Later the Need to Ponder!
Indian J Psychol Med. 2013 Jan;35(1):101-5. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.112220.
4
Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Emerging Issues From a Global Perspective.
J Palliat Care. 2018 Oct;33(4):197-203. doi: 10.1177/0825859718777325. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
5
Physician assisted suicide in dementia: A critical review of global evidence and considerations from India.
Asian J Psychiatr. 2021 Oct;64:102802. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102802. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
9
Euthanasia: Global Scenario and Its Status in India.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Apr;24(2):349-360. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9946-7. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
10
Physician-assisted suicide: the legal slippery slope.
Cancer Control. 2001 Jan-Feb;8(1):25-31. doi: 10.1177/107327480100800104.

引用本文的文献

1
Awareness and attitudes toward euthanasia: A cross-sectional study among diverse demographic groups in India.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2025 Jun;14(6):2538-2543. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_175_25. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
3
What medical conditions lead to a request for euthanasia? A rapid scoping review.
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 20;7(3):e1978. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1978. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Living will: Todays thoughts and actions.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Jan;13(1):20-23. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_482_22. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
5
Perspectives of Major World Religions regarding Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: A Comparative Analysis.
J Relig Health. 2022 Dec;61(6):4758-4782. doi: 10.1007/s10943-022-01498-5. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
6
The UNESCO movement for bioethics in medical education and the Indian scenario.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2016 Oct-Dec;58(4):359-362. doi: 10.4103/0019-5545.196722.
7
Awareness and Attitude of Select Professionals toward Euthanasia in Delhi, India.
Indian J Palliat Care. 2016 Oct-Dec;22(4):485-490. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.191856.
8
'Euthanasia: right to die with dignity'.
J Family Med Prim Care. 2014 Oct-Dec;3(4):477-8. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.148161.

本文引用的文献

1
End-of-life: a Hindu view.
Lancet. 2005;366(9486):682-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67141-3.
3
A national survey of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the United States.
N Engl J Med. 1998 Apr 23;338(17):1193-201. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199804233381706.
4
Oncologists' recognition of depression in their patients with cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Apr;16(4):1594-600. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.4.1594.
6
Physician desire for euthanasia and assisted suicide: would physicians practice what they preach?
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Feb;15(2):428-32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.2.428.
8
Physician-assisted suicide and patients with human immunodeficiency virus disease.
N Engl J Med. 1997 Feb 6;336(6):417-21. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199702063360606.
10
Attitudes of Oregon psychiatrists toward physician-assisted suicide.
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Nov;153(11):1469-75. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.11.1469.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验