Suppr超能文献

家庭为基础的教育与住院教育在新诊断为 1 型糖尿病的儿童中的应用比较。

Home-based vs inpatient education for children newly diagnosed with type 1 diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Australia.

Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

Pediatr Diabetes. 2017 Nov;18(7):579-587. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12466. Epub 2016 Nov 3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Initial management of children diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (T1D) varies worldwide with sparse high quality evidence regarding the impact of different models of care.

AIM

To compare the inpatient model of care with a hybrid home-based alternative, examining metabolic and psychosocial outcomes, diabetes knowledge, length of stay, and patient satisfaction.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

The study design was a randomized-controlled trial. Inclusion criteria were: newly diagnosed T1D, aged 3 to 16 years, living within approximately 1 hour of the hospital, English-speaking, access to transport, absence of significant medical or psychosocial comorbidity. Patients were randomized to standard care with a 5 to 6 day initial inpatient stay or discharge after 2 days for home-based management. All patients received practical skills training in the first 48 hours. The intervention group was visited twice/day by a nurse for 2 days to assist with injections, then a multi-disciplinary team made 3 home visits over 2 weeks to complete education. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Clinical outcomes included HbA1c, hypoglycemia, and diabetes-related readmissions. Surveys measured patient satisfaction, diabetes knowledge, family impact, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Fifty patients were recruited, 25 to each group. There were no differences in medical or psychosocial outcomes or diabetes knowledge. Average length of admission was 1.9 days shorter for the intervention group. Families indicated that with hindsight, most would choose home- over hospital-based management.

CONCLUSIONS

With adequate support, children newly diagnosed with T1D can be safely managed at home following practical skills training.

摘要

背景

全球范围内,1 型糖尿病(T1D)患儿的初始管理方式各不相同,有关不同护理模式影响的高质量证据稀缺。

目的

比较住院护理模式与基于家庭的混合替代模式,观察代谢和心理社会结局、糖尿病知识、住院时间和患者满意度。

受试者和方法

研究设计为随机对照试验。纳入标准为:新诊断的 T1D,年龄 3 至 16 岁,居住在距医院约 1 小时以内,讲英语,有交通工具,无重大医疗或心理社会合并症。患者随机分为标准护理组,初始住院 5-6 天,或在 2 天内出院进行家庭管理。所有患者在最初的 48 小时内接受实践技能培训。干预组由护士每天家访 2 次,以协助注射,然后多学科团队在 2 周内进行 3 次家访以完成教育。患者随访 12 个月。临床结局包括 HbA1c、低血糖和与糖尿病相关的再入院。调查测量了患者满意度、糖尿病知识、家庭影响和生活质量。

结果

共招募了 50 名患者,每组 25 名。在医疗或心理社会结局或糖尿病知识方面,两组无差异。干预组的平均住院时间缩短了 1.9 天。家属表示,如果有先见之明,大多数人会选择家庭管理而不是住院管理。

结论

在获得充分支持的情况下,接受实践技能培训后,新诊断的 T1D 儿童可以安全地在家中接受管理。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验