Platek Mary E, Jayaprakash Vijayvel, Gupta Vishal, Cohan David M, Hicks Wesley L, Winslow Timothy B, Platek Alexis J, Groman Adrienne, Dibaj Shiva, Arshad Hassan, Kuriakose Moni A, Warren Graham W, Singh Anurag K
Department of Head and Neck/Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, U.S.A.
Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, U.S.A.
Laryngoscope. 2017 May;127(5):1087-1092. doi: 10.1002/lary.26369. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate subsite-specific differences in survival between squamous cell carcinomas of the base of tongue and tonsillar fossa in a modern cohort likely to have been treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy, chemotherapy for stage III and IV, and have had a high incidence of human papillomavirus-associated tumors.
Retrospective cohort analysis utilizing data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program of patients with base of tongue and tonsillar fossa squamous cell carcinoma from 2004 to 2011.
The cohort included 15,299 primary base of tongue and tonsillar fossa squamous cell carcinoma patients without distant metastases treated between 2004 and 2011. Subsite differences in overall survival and disease-specific survival were examined with Kaplan-Meier curves. Multivariate cox proportional hazard ratios were estimated for overall and disease-specific survival.
The cohort included 7,220 (47.2%) base of tongue and 8,079 (52.8%) tonsillar fossa squamous cell carcinoma patients. Overall survival with all stages combined favored tonsillar fossa (P < .001) and remained superior when stratified by stage. In multivariate analyses adjusted for age, gender, race, and treatment, the hazard ratio for overall survival was superior for tonsillar fossa tumors compared to base of tongue tumors for all stages (stage 1, P = .041; stage 2, P = .006; stages 3 and 4, P < .001). Disease-specific survival also favored improved outcomes for tonsillar fossa.
In this large modern cohort, overall and disease-specific survival favored outcomes in tonsillar fossa compared with base of tongue. Further study is required to evaluate factors that influence survival differences between tonsillar fossa and base of tongue despite modern therapy.
4 Laryngoscope, 127:1087-1092, 2017.
目的/假设:在一个可能接受调强放射治疗、III期和IV期化疗且人乳头瘤病毒相关肿瘤发病率较高的现代队列中,评估舌根和扁桃体窝鳞状细胞癌在特定亚部位的生存差异。
利用2004年至2011年监测、流行病学和最终结果计划中舌根和扁桃体窝鳞状细胞癌患者的数据进行回顾性队列分析。
该队列包括2004年至2011年间治疗的15299例无远处转移的原发性舌根和扁桃体窝鳞状细胞癌患者。用Kaplan-Meier曲线检查总生存和疾病特异性生存的亚部位差异。估计总生存和疾病特异性生存的多变量cox比例风险比。
该队列包括7220例(47.2%)舌根和8079例(52.8%)扁桃体窝鳞状细胞癌患者。所有分期合并的总生存有利于扁桃体窝(P <.001),按分期分层时仍更优。在根据年龄、性别、种族和治疗进行调整的多变量分析中,所有分期的扁桃体窝肿瘤总生存风险比相对于舌根肿瘤更优(1期,P =.041;2期,P =.006;3期和4期,P <.001)。疾病特异性生存也有利于扁桃体窝获得更好的结果。
在这个大型现代队列中,与舌根相比,扁桃体窝的总生存和疾病特异性生存结果更优。尽管有现代治疗方法,仍需要进一步研究以评估影响扁桃体窝和舌根生存差异的因素。
4《喉镜》,127:1087 - 1092,2017年。